Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
Moderator: Oversight Staff
- iightfyre
- Corrupted Treant
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:52 pm
- Location: San Diego, CA
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
Meh. I watched a bunch of replays and it doesn't look that OP to me. (5hand split his creeps with this tact which looks def OP and might catch on http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=3071818.w3g)
Anyway.. I will stick to my original opinion that not allowing players to build on the dark green area is the best fix for this if it truly is a problem.
Anyway.. I will stick to my original opinion that not allowing players to build on the dark green area is the best fix for this if it truly is a problem.
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
^ that would be harder to detect tho. A scan for AS is so simple but ye.. :o
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
- iightfyre
- Corrupted Treant
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:52 pm
- Location: San Diego, CA
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
@art)y - But once the scans are done we would need to review the replay during the AS use to see if its being used at the corner or not (because the proposition is only to make it against the rules for this particular use). This would be more time consuming than just going 8x on a replay and seeing if towers are built on the dark green?
Agree to disagree? or? lol...
Agree to disagree? or? lol...
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
iightfyre wrote:This would be more time consuming than just going 8x on a replay and seeing if towers are built on the dark green?
Method "Green": You dont know when. You gotta watch the whole replay.
Method "AS": You know the exact time and can forward to it while doing other stuffs.
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
Re: Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
I would support outlawing AS. It's so abused, and by it's very name is taking advantage of improper game mechanic functions. It really doesn't take overly long to check them, and users could do it for the mods - with the mention in ban requests should be quite easy to locate.
@shameless
@shameless
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
just FYI look how can it be
- Attachments
-
- 5hand as abuse.w3g
- (242.21 KiB) Downloaded 40 times
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3484
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:26 pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 39 times
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
Well, someone summarize the current opinions/options and I'll add it.
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
Modes pro prohibition(4):
Mods contra: None?
Users who shared their opinions in this thread, pro prohibition: Strikest, I_kill_satan, Plunderer (at least how I got it, let me know when it is wrong)
Users contra: none
Neutral:
If someone feels on the wrong place, let me know please.^^
nabo. wrote:I agree to this suggestion.
JunZzi wrote:Currently, it is allowed, But i've noticed that it's becoming a problem in 1v1, Abusing the mechanism to gain advantage.
I completely agree with skiller, that we shouldn't allow the use of AS to gain the advantage that the 1v1 people are trying to gain.
Isis wrote:I support this.
BeepBoopBeep wrote:It's definitely abuse, pulling summon's that they die first and creep's so they can kill x amount of creep's before the bulk of the creep wave hit's your towers.
At the current moment we have no rule, that restricts this from being abused as it currently is.
Mods contra: None?
Users who shared their opinions in this thread, pro prohibition: Strikest, I_kill_satan, Plunderer (at least how I got it, let me know when it is wrong)
Users contra: none
Neutral:
iightfyre wrote:Meh. I watched a bunch of replays and it doesn't look that OP to me. (5hand split his creeps with this tact which looks def OP and might catch on http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/view_replay.php?file=3071818.w3g)
Anyway.. I will stick to my original opinion that not allowing players to build on the dark green area is the best fix for this if it truly is a problem.
If someone feels on the wrong place, let me know please.^^
Last edited by skillerinstinct on Tue Mar 04, 2014 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
Im all for prohibiting AntiStuck in 1v1's, as it is being used to gain an unfair advantage more so then in normal 4v4.
I'm against prohibiting it in regular games.
I'm against prohibiting it in regular games.
Only a mind free of impediments is capable of grasping the chaotic beauty of the world. This is our greatest asset.
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
Oh didn't see, I got you twice. Well, then it is no contra at all I guess?
There only have been differences in how to realize it. The only concrete suggestion yet came from iightfire:
Which seems to be an acceptable solution to me. Especially, since the actual game idea of middle build for sure wasn't to use it in 1v1 that way(outplaying sends), even without the glitch abuse.
Also prohibit antistuck before all towers are dead and making it report requirement to call the exact time of AS abuse, doesn't sound too complicated to me. But some mods expected issues with this.
There only have been differences in how to realize it. The only concrete suggestion yet came from iightfire:
iightfyre wrote:Anyway.. I will stick to my original opinion that not allowing players to build on the dark green area is the best fix for this if it truly is a problem.
Which seems to be an acceptable solution to me. Especially, since the actual game idea of middle build for sure wasn't to use it in 1v1 that way(outplaying sends), even without the glitch abuse.
Also prohibit antistuck before all towers are dead and making it report requirement to call the exact time of AS abuse, doesn't sound too complicated to me. But some mods expected issues with this.
Re: Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
Only a mind free of impediments is capable of grasping the chaotic beauty of the world. This is our greatest asset.
- iightfyre
- Corrupted Treant
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:52 pm
- Location: San Diego, CA
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Antistuck abuse on LTD 1v1 bot
Well. In my opinion, there are 2 viable actions that we can take. (This is a proposition for the 1v1 bot only)
1. New rule - Players cannot build in the dark green area.
2. New rule - Players cannot use AS except when creeps are actually stuck.
Both will solve the problem and have their own pros and cons. I suggest we take a vote and make a swift (ish) decision on the matter.
I vote for #1
PS - I created a poll to further this discussion. --> https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=26229&p=117201#p117201
1. New rule - Players cannot build in the dark green area.
2. New rule - Players cannot use AS except when creeps are actually stuck.
Both will solve the problem and have their own pros and cons. I suggest we take a vote and make a swift (ish) decision on the matter.
I vote for #1
PS - I created a poll to further this discussion. --> https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=26229&p=117201#p117201
Return to “Suggestion Archive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests