LOD +1200

[iam_thebest]

Maybe think over to create an bot for lod with over 1200 elo, too many newbs join to ruin the games, it would improve the game experience a lot. regards

[Lord-Miles]

Suggest that many times in the past and been rejected , but i still don't know the reason that were rejected since there is lot of players on LOD DOTA and many of them like to play good games , because at this time in lod game you find 2-3 game ruiners per game for sure.

[FalenGa]

The LOD bot has an average of 6 games per hour. This means 1 game per 10 minutes. Again, that's the average. Don't just focus on the peak hours.

Adding a 2nd LOD bot would split the traffic, decreasing that average even further. Which is why such suggestions have been denied.

[Lord-Miles]

The LOD bot has an average of 6 games per hour. This means 1 game per 10 minutes. Again, that's the average. Don't just focus on the peak hours.

Adding a 2nd LOD bot would split the traffic, decreasing that average even further. Which is why such suggestions have been denied.

Not agreed with you , because you aint a lod player first of all , second there is times that 10 lod games starts in 10 minutes not like 1 game per 10 min but 10 games for 10 min , saw that many times , the point is we dont like to play with game ruiners aka noobs coz they destroy the games.

[FalenGa]

Me not being an LOD player is completely irrelevant. I can't follow your logic on this one.

As i said above, don't get hang up on the peak hours. The average is the average.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Average

[Lord-Miles]

But we lod players would like to have 1200 bot to play a good games , like legion td got lihl , so is it that hard to give a try?

[Jabba41]

back then when legion td 1100+ was implemented mega had a arround 9 games every 10 minutes (mega and europe combined)
and we had a hard time making the bot popular.
legion td hell got 3 times the amount of games than lod when the 1100+ bot was implemented and had like 0.3 games per day until it got revoked.
"giving a try" on an even lower player base would make no sence.

[Jabba41]

I think broud3r nailed it.

Why dont you meeet up and create your own games via private host?
Maybe use discord as a plattform to manage it.

[Lord-Miles]

Well guys i believe it will cost you nothing just to give a short try on a lod bot for example +1150-1200 elo , i believe it will progress .

[CheW]

Too many smurfs that rely on stacking in LoD. I'd love a 1200 bot but I doubt it would work. But there's no harm in trying

[Yoto]

I would support this idea personally. I'm either constantly playing on random "smurfs" or resetting my stats because I'll have someone who gets more joy out of being bad and ruining what's suppose to be an enjoyable experience for others for personal gain. I'm not always playing for stats because that's boring. But when you are attempting to enjoy a game and some new account, old player goes 0/17 doesn't provide me quality gaming experience in any way. Maybe reaching for 1200+ might be a bit hard, but surely something more like 1100-1150+ would allow many more people looking for decent games to respect this game more.

[Burnt]

We can try. Let's only go 1200+ in peak hours and see how it goes

[CheW]

@yoto

I guess you havent seen how bad some of the 1200s are

[John001]

good idea people.

[Jabba41]

Stop spamming this topic or it will get locked while waiting for a decision.