dota top players issue
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:18 pm
I want to talk about and suggest a fix to a big problem in the dota community, no one plays on their main account anymore. lots of people suggest to not allow smurfs, but I don't think smurfing is the problem. I think the "top players" listing is the problem
first, please take a look at the top players: https://entgaming.net/openstats/dota/top/
look at their accounts and take note of the last time they played, and how many times they played. heres looking at each of the profiles in the top ten
saint: 2 games, back in December
dhamma: last played December
zam: no games
product: 1 game, January 21st
barbaesthero: Jan 6th
korean: no games
greenmtn: last played November
iwinifyoulose: 1 game, September
raining: no games
smoker_: last played December
what you should notice is, hardly any of them are even playing. and the ones who are playing are doing the bare minimum games they need to not get their accs cleared (once every 3 months)
now I have a question, can one really be considered a "top player" if they are too afraid to even play the game anymore for fear of losing their internet points?
this is my suggestion, being active should be a requirement to being listed in the top ten page (at least), and maybe the top players tab
I am not saying to clear their stats for inactivity, I am just saying to hide them from the page if they are inactive. you could do this by adding a requirement like: must have played 5 dota games in the past week to be listed. these numbers could be adjusted obviously for fairness, but the principle is that in order to be a top player, you have to actually play the game
not only would this make the top player page more reasonable (for example, clearing people who are actually inactive), it would force people to play atleast some games on their main account, which would help cut down on the Major smurfing issue going on right now. it's impossible to find a dota game without 3+ new acc smurfs these days. this would discourage stacking your way into the top ten then sitting on your internet points forever... which lets be honest is pretty sad
nearly everyone with reasonably high elos is inactive, and they dont deserve to be listed as a top player if they are. a 1200 elo person who plays the game is more deserving of the spot than a cowardly 2500 elo player
first, please take a look at the top players: https://entgaming.net/openstats/dota/top/
look at their accounts and take note of the last time they played, and how many times they played. heres looking at each of the profiles in the top ten
saint: 2 games, back in December
dhamma: last played December
zam: no games
product: 1 game, January 21st
barbaesthero: Jan 6th
korean: no games
greenmtn: last played November
iwinifyoulose: 1 game, September
raining: no games
smoker_: last played December
what you should notice is, hardly any of them are even playing. and the ones who are playing are doing the bare minimum games they need to not get their accs cleared (once every 3 months)
now I have a question, can one really be considered a "top player" if they are too afraid to even play the game anymore for fear of losing their internet points?
this is my suggestion, being active should be a requirement to being listed in the top ten page (at least), and maybe the top players tab
I am not saying to clear their stats for inactivity, I am just saying to hide them from the page if they are inactive. you could do this by adding a requirement like: must have played 5 dota games in the past week to be listed. these numbers could be adjusted obviously for fairness, but the principle is that in order to be a top player, you have to actually play the game
not only would this make the top player page more reasonable (for example, clearing people who are actually inactive), it would force people to play atleast some games on their main account, which would help cut down on the Major smurfing issue going on right now. it's impossible to find a dota game without 3+ new acc smurfs these days. this would discourage stacking your way into the top ten then sitting on your internet points forever... which lets be honest is pretty sad
nearly everyone with reasonably high elos is inactive, and they dont deserve to be listed as a top player if they are. a 1200 elo person who plays the game is more deserving of the spot than a cowardly 2500 elo player