Simplified BRQ/Appeal form

Suggestions will be moved here once processed.

Moderator: Oversight Staff

User avatar
Shameless
Treant Protector
Posts: 577
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:37 pm
Location: New York
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Simplified BRQ/Appeal form

Postby Shameless » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:57 pm

https://www.phpbb.com/customise/db/mod/ ... m_creator/

Image

Could something like this be beneficial, rewritten to include drop boxes for specific Games/Violations?
Image
We Dance On The Brink Of Madness :mrgreen:

User avatar
Jiminy_Cricket
Poison Treant
Posts: 1022
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 11:50 pm
Location: Montana
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Simplified BRQ/Appeal form

Postby Jiminy_Cricket » Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:42 pm

hmmm. Yes I agree. Mandatory fill in boxes including a time stamp box that will not allow "all game" as an answer.
Off topic:
Av1oN: Announcing the official ban of jiminy_cricket
Av1oN: From all LoD bots
Av1oN: for 1 year
HazarDous: rofl
Sat: wtf
HazarDous: he would turn crazy
Sat: tats like banning batman from gotham
HazarDous: XD
Av1oN: so who's making the brq

Mercy

Re: Simplified BRQ/Appeal form

Postby Mercy » Wed Oct 21, 2015 2:45 pm

I agree, this would be a good format to have. It would increase productivity due to reducing the amount of 'all game' requests.

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: Simplified BRQ/Appeal form

Postby aRt)Y » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:13 pm

Moderators simply have to post "please provide more times-temps or your request might get denied".

Having it mandatory with a blacklist of words is not beneficial.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition

User avatar
Shameless
Treant Protector
Posts: 577
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:37 pm
Location: New York
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Simplified BRQ/Appeal form

Postby Shameless » Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:52 pm

np. I was not really thinking time stamps, more along the lines of people who might not know how to say/write everything can look at a list of violations/realms/games and so on. Was just thought.
Image
We Dance On The Brink Of Madness :mrgreen:

User avatar
Jiminy_Cricket
Poison Treant
Posts: 1022
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 11:50 pm
Location: Montana
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Simplified BRQ/Appeal form

Postby Jiminy_Cricket » Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:49 am

aRt)Y wrote:Moderators simply have to post "please provide more times-temps or your request might get denied".

Having it mandatory with a blacklist of words is not beneficial.



It is beneficial when you factor in the time it takes for mods to check their request, then for the player to get back to them, then for the mod to check the request again. A simple fill in the blank time stamps box that requires numbers and has a check box for replay or game time would cut down on time in the long run fo shizz my nizz.
Off topic:
Av1oN: Announcing the official ban of jiminy_cricket
Av1oN: From all LoD bots
Av1oN: for 1 year
HazarDous: rofl
Sat: wtf
HazarDous: he would turn crazy
Sat: tats like banning batman from gotham
HazarDous: XD
Av1oN: so who's making the brq

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: Simplified BRQ/Appeal form

Postby aRt)Y » Thu Oct 22, 2015 7:36 am

Having restrictions like "requires numbers" wont work though, as I said. Ban requests and the way people post them are too individual.

I will have a look into it anyway.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition


Return to “Suggestion Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests