Have this been discussed yet ?
I will use the word "discrimination" to talk about people who struggle finding games where they don't play versus stacking 1000 + people.
+ , it would make 1000 + a realy nice place, much more peaceful because people would have been practicing until they manage to win games
This would realy improve the experience for everyone !
wouldn't it ?
Why no server for players under 1000 ?
- FalenGa
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 7857
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:38 pm
- Location: Mars
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 138 times
Re: Why no server for players under 1000 ?
Because it takes 5 seconds for a player with under 1k elo to create a new account, and automatically receive 1k elo. Pure waste of resources.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 2:42 am
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 125 times
Re: Why no server for players under 1000 ?
thats not the point hes making at all, the regular mega bot would not be 1000+ it would remain the same, but a bot specifically for ppl who WANT to play with >1k elo players (to improve or not be put up against stacked teams all the time)
- These users thanked the author TinSoldier for the post:
- Shatan (Sat Jun 24, 2017 8:38 am)
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: Why no server for players under 1000 ?
Which would split the community again, wouldnt it?TinSoldier wrote:thats not the point hes making at all, the regular mega bot would not be 1000+ it would remain the same, but a bot specifically for ppl who WANT to play with >1k elo players (to improve or not be put up against stacked teams all the time)
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
- Dong
- Donator
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 8:16 pm
- Has thanked: 55 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: Why no server for players under 1000 ?
how far out of the question would a non elo regulating bot be ?
like a practice bot or fun bot for all players, where there might be more enjoyment because the fear of losing elo is gone ?
idk.. just a suggestion
Dong-
like a practice bot or fun bot for all players, where there might be more enjoyment because the fear of losing elo is gone ?
idk.. just a suggestion
Dong-
Thou shall self tk.
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 10:26 pm
- Has thanked: 55 times
- Been thanked: 145 times
Re: Why no server for players under 1000 ?
give @dong a home he doesn't get flamed in
-----
LIHL player parser, a tool to automatically parse LIHL players' Elo and create reports for it: CLICK
LIHL player parser, a tool to automatically parse LIHL players' Elo and create reports for it: CLICK
- ahols91
- Treant
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 7:24 am
- Location: Norway
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Why no server for players under 1000 ?
Man, I asked several low elo/new players today if they knew what the purpose of LTD was. Nobody knew it was a race to kill the opponents king.
I know it's just a waste of recourse but a bot for newbies would certainly help on the game experience for many. But I fear the selfishness and unwillingness to learn has a higher crowd which means nearly nobody of the new players would be interested aswell.
I know it's just a waste of recourse but a bot for newbies would certainly help on the game experience for many. But I fear the selfishness and unwillingness to learn has a higher crowd which means nearly nobody of the new players would be interested aswell.
'ddddsasdf
- FalenGa
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 7857
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:38 pm
- Location: Mars
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 138 times
Re: Why no server for players under 1000 ?
The purpose of the no-elo-restriction bot is to mix older, more experienced players with new, less experienced ones. That way, if the new players want to learn, and the old ones are willing to teach/offer advice, the process won't take nearly as long as it would take someone to learn the basics on his own.
Once they have enough experience/elo/confidence, they can move to the 1200+ bot, with higher competition and more skilled players.
Forcing people with lower elo out of the normal bot not only would look bad ( Hey, you. You are bad, you can't play here! ), but it would also delay their learning experience.
Once they have enough experience/elo/confidence, they can move to the 1200+ bot, with higher competition and more skilled players.
Forcing people with lower elo out of the normal bot not only would look bad ( Hey, you. You are bad, you can't play here! ), but it would also delay their learning experience.
- bezdak
- Corrupted Treant
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 12:54 am
- Location: Slovakia
- Has thanked: 83 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
Re: Why no server for players under 1000 ?
FalenGa said it very well.
The no-ELO bot would be worth of consideration, however I don't think community is big enough to such bot being active. It lacks any kind of motivational aspect to play or even try to win, better to just host such game yourself.
The no-ELO bot would be worth of consideration, however I don't think community is big enough to such bot being active. It lacks any kind of motivational aspect to play or even try to win, better to just host such game yourself.
"Flame don´t make people play better" - Wolke
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests