ToxicClogger
Moderator: LIHL Staff
-
- Treant
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 4:23 am
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 49 times
-
- Plague Treant
- Posts: 1895
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:45 pm
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 32 times
Re: ToxicClogger
What else do we have to say ?
Kind of this players don't belong to LIHL.
viewtopic.php?f=172&p=430480#p430480
Kind of this players don't belong to LIHL.
viewtopic.php?f=172&p=430480#p430480
- These users thanked the author Lord-Miles for the post (total 2):
- Varg (Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:04 pm) • magicpotatoes (Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:37 am)
- Escaflowne
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:30 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: ToxicClogger
Has he even played enough games? 8/8 is very few in almost three weeks time.. As is the case with the other trial vouches.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 10:38 am
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: ToxicClogger
Played only 1 game so far, wasn't such a great experience. I won't comment the ban it's out of my range.
Nevertheless i wont make such a shorcut to Hodor behavior. He has been integrated quite fast and showed his motivation.
Nevertheless i wont make such a shorcut to Hodor behavior. He has been integrated quite fast and showed his motivation.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 947
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 10:38 am
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 113 times
Re: ToxicClogger
i agree with u. Hodor didnt rlly made any fault appart being his friend. Idk why he really got banned becuz was his friend trolling and wispering him his units cuz he was mad etc. I think Hodor is clean on this but sk.... so sad man. I even gave u support assuming u could fit same way as Hodor did but man... so hard to trust someone that behaves like u on 1200 bot. Quite toxic behave does not fit lihl at all...
- These users thanked the author FadingSuns for the post:
- Varg (Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:56 pm)
- Krocis
- Treant
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 10:21 am
- Has thanked: 61 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: ToxicClogger
I dont get how ppl these days got so ez trial vouch. I had to work hard play hard, to get chance but Tk.73 who have never played solid and never ever behave as polite person just get vouch. He plays for years and his skills are out of lihl range, rly.
- Nore
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:58 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 26 times
Re: ToxicClogger
Krocis wrote:I dont get how ppl these days got so ez trial vouch. I had to work hard play hard, to get chance but Tk.73 who have never played solid and never ever behave as polite person just get vouch. He plays for years and his skills are out of lihl range, rly.
People still get denied all the time.. check the "Denied" section and see for yourself. As to this 1200+ report, I am thinking that though this is obviously frowned upon, it did not take place here, and thus will not effect his trial.
Should he do something so foolish here, the consequences would be swift and extensive, but the 1200+ bot is not lihl, and his punishment will not be more than what has already been levied against him. They both technically got unvouched anyways, as being banned on ENT bans you here, as well. So, for all you people looking for blood, there it is.
They were doubly punished by getting banned from ENT, so let's take this for what it is and leave the judgements for LIHL only please. Until we see some solid evidence against either player being discussed here from LIHL games or lobbies, there is nothing2do.
God is my strength.
- Escaflowne
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:30 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: ToxicClogger
Krocis, it was easier getting vouched before since all you needed was five !supports from various lihl players. In ToxicClogger's case it's not the skill lvl that's the issue imo, as he's more skilled than some players already in the league. It's more the issue of not being able to cooperate with team and being really toxic.
- ArMeDaNdDeAdLy
- Treant
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:58 pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Re: ToxicClogger
Doesnt pay attention to the game,doesnt know the map well, his behaviour is bad, not lihl material.
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9377681
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9377681
- These users thanked the author ArMeDaNdDeAdLy for the post (total 3):
- SLSGuennter (Wed May 17, 2017 3:20 pm) • magicpotatoes (Tue May 16, 2017 9:04 pm) • Pinkyyyyy (Tue May 16, 2017 6:08 pm)
- Nore
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:58 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 26 times
Re: ToxicClogger
Well, with all the circumstances weighed, we have decided that you are not a good fit for LIHL atm.
Your trial phase had some controversy, but most importantly we do not see your skill being quite up to our standards (you routinely mess up what would normally be good rolls, and fail to communicate well with others).
Please feel free to reapply in 2-3 weeks minimum if you would like to try again. You are not far from what we are looking for, but not quite there yet.
Denied.
Your trial phase had some controversy, but most importantly we do not see your skill being quite up to our standards (you routinely mess up what would normally be good rolls, and fail to communicate well with others).
Please feel free to reapply in 2-3 weeks minimum if you would like to try again. You are not far from what we are looking for, but not quite there yet.
Denied.
God is my strength.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests