Shrimp behavior

Moderator: LIHL Staff

User avatar
SLSGuennter
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3075
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:39 am
Location: Ingame ... most likely
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby SLSGuennter » Tue Nov 03, 2015 7:25 pm

cam_breezy wrote:says the guy that goes afk to text on his phone, dc's every other game and hardly ever plays in the first place. why are you here @mickeythemousie
i am a highly skilled active player. get off my d


This quote is kinda all you need to know about his behaviour.
Gunther and the Sunshine-Girls. Hell Yeah

OccupyW.Street
Aura Tree
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:31 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby OccupyW.Street » Tue Nov 03, 2015 8:13 pm

"ENT Gaming
Welcome to ENT Gaming! We're an active and friendly Warcraft III gaming community, and much more. Come over to our forums or talk to us in the web chatroom!"

The first thing I read when I entered entgaming.net.
Being friendly should at least apply to the players in the in-house leagues.

cam_breezy
Donator
Posts: 302
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 6:19 am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby cam_breezy » Wed Nov 04, 2015 12:13 am

truth is we can create a thread about many players here in the league and go on and on and on about their behavior. this post was about my attitude towards occupy's builds and it once again has turned into the ongoing topic of my so called abuse toward dc reports. if it makes everybody happy.

i will no longer report anybody ever again for anything.

im sick of the bickering. and yes i am greedy about my elo because i feel that far too many veteran players tk'ing the simplest of builds which is why i flamed occupy in the first place. i already apologized to him earlier in this post and have been civil with him in plenty of games since then.

everybody knows my attitude and manner is no different than anybody else in this league. this is clearly all about the same salty subject of dc pens which i will state again... i will no longer report. the fame is far too much for me to handle.

User avatar
Artichoke
Forest Walker
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:26 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby Artichoke » Wed Nov 04, 2015 11:53 am

You are still missing the point. Most people here do not care about ELO as much as you. DC penalties are not the sole reason people are upset with you. It's a culmination of all the transgressions you've made over time, including but not limited to: flaming, whining, blackmail, abuse of the report system, and low skill play.

I haven't seen any other player cry TK as much as you while actually being the TKer. I just watched the replay posted at the top of this page where some new guy I've never even seen in LIHL before complained about your lack of skill. If someone new to the league who probably isn't even accustomed to LIHL complains about the skill level of a "pro" such as yourself, you know there's something wrong with your play. I shouldn't have to explain this but when you are holder for levels 7 and 10 you are expected to hold 14/15 most of the time as well with all that feed. Instead you built a Dragonhawk and only ended up having 2 ToKs for 14 which is incredibly TK given most of your team were leaking and relying on you to hold. You claim:

(30:53 / Allied) shrimp: was short 40 gold
(30:56 / Allied) shrimp: im 40 cineome

Yet you could easily sell a smaller tower and get 3 ToK and clear your lane or even go mid. I'd for sure sell a Soul of Villain and take the -85 value hit than building 320 value worth of a useless unit. This may seem basic but since you clearly lack knowledge let me break it down: Dragonhawk = magic damage / medium armor. This means it does 80% damage to level 14 while taking 120%. Essentially, the unit is worthless. It's not even good on 15 or 17 either. You could hold so easily even with 7/6 if you just got 3 ToK, otherwise you could just stay 7/5 and clear some units mid. Keep in mind this is just the first replay I've found of you. I could write a 10,000 word essay about all the times you've TK'd. The worst thing is, even after you TK you blame team and say "oh it would make no difference", "oh my team TK'd me". It's frankly disgusting to watch.

Finally, I'd like to touch on the blatant hypocrisy of your actions. Back in the day when I still played here actively you would flame me almost every game. I never reported you because I didn't care enough to take the time to do it. Yet, the minute I flamed you back one time you cried to the mods and I got banned. In your post you claimed "I've made amends with everyone and am a mannered player now but Artichoke keeps flaming me please help!". Similarly, in this thread it was shown that you tried to blackmail Occupy with threatening to report Mick. Then, you have the audacity to post this:

cam_breezy wrote:@occupyw.street i promise to be nicer to you okay. lets be friends. add me on instagram. cam_breeeezy with 4 e's

pewpew lasergun wrote:yes he shows much bad behavior,
including but not limited to flaming, spamming every game to force other players to play a different mode, excessive/abusive reporting, and ignores rules which he got many bans for.


this is a clan, we should be playing more custom games, otherwise we are just a glorified 1200+ clan... which is kinda lame


Each time evidence of your mean-spirited character or poor attitude comes out you make claims promising you've changed overnight and are now a nice, mannered and pleasant player. You're like the equivalent of a convicted pedophile applying for a job as a babysitter and, when confronted about your conviction, saying "oh don't worry about that, I've changed my ways now please stop flaming me!".


The reason people have a problem with you is not solely your DC penalty abuse, though that is part of it. It's a combination of all the things you do and the toxic, hypocritical attitude you display. To give a final example:

cam_breezy wrote:says a known ghoster


Just because you don't like what I'm saying you make baseless and false claims against me. Kindly provide a single shred of evidence of me ever ghosting for anyone. This is the classic argumentative strategy of using ad hominem attacks to try to discredit the speaker because you don't want the valid criticism he presents to be heard or taken seriously.

bugatti_veyron
Forest Walker
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:17 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby bugatti_veyron » Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:16 pm

Damn tastay u've changed first nore now shrimp.
Anyway, how are the mods choosing to ignore this pattern of "i just played a game with shrimp and i'm losing faith in humanity".
Stop reporting every single DC or dodge.
Stop thinking u know better than everyone.
Stop being toxic.
Stop making everyone depressed when they see u on their team.
Actually stop signing for games.

tastay
Forest Walker
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 9:47 am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby tastay » Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:33 pm

Where have you been my adi

been boring lately with these kids

and you know I love and hate everyone at the same time

cam_breezy
Donator
Posts: 302
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 6:19 am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby cam_breezy » Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:02 pm

there is no pattern. i talked shit to occupy over 2-3 games. thats it, the rest is the same old shit just re bringing it up again.
there is no case here besides some mild flame. which everybody is guilty for.

User avatar
Artichoke
Forest Walker
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:26 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby Artichoke » Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:40 pm

cam_breezy wrote:please learn the definition of blackmail people.


"Blackmail is an act, often a crime, involving unjustified threats to make a gain or cause loss to another unless a demand is met."

(05:28 / All) shrimp: either i take 40 from mick
(05:31 / All) shrimp: or lose 15 each?
(05:32 / All) shrimp: which one?

(05:40 / All) OccupyW.Street: you have to draw
(05:43 / All) shrimp: this is true
(05:43 / All) shrimp: but
(05:43 / All) shrimp: im giving u an option
(05:43 / All) shrimp: i take 40 from mick
(05:43 / All) shrimp: or take for the team?

(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: you are not giving me an option
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: you are giving yourself a reason
(05:43 / All) shrimp: u can be a nice guy for mick?
(05:43 / All) shrimp: by losing 15
(05:43 / All) shrimp: or ima take 40 from him
(05:43 / All) shrimp: idc
(05:43 / All) shrimp: ur choice

(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: dude
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: you are just sad
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: how am i supposed to play 1v2
(05:43 / All) shrimp: not asking u to play
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: we won this one
(05:43 / All) shrimp: asking you to ff
(05:43 / All) shrimp: we turrets aqua
(05:43 / All) Rolders: were u doing 5 or 7
(05:43 / All) Rolders: or 4 again
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: dont matter
(05:43 / All) Rolders: jw
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: its open game
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: we got advantage this game
(05:43 / All) shrimp: how?
(05:43 / All) shrimp: whats ur towers?
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: just like you "had" last game
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: lol
(05:43 / All) shrimp: archer aqua?
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: we had arch + lod, turr
(05:43 / All) shrimp: lol
(05:43 / All) shrimp: anybody can win then
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: just like last game yes
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: stupid...
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: Player [Rolders]'s draw vote has been recalled automatically (three minutes have elapsed).
(05:43 / All) shrimp: okay well i will draw easily
(05:43 / All) shrimp: but

(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: Player [OccupyW.Street]'s draw vote has been recalled automatically (three minutes have elapsed).
(05:43 / All) shrimp: just giving u a chance to be nice guy for mick
(05:43 / All) Rolders: !draw
(05:43 / All) OccupyW.Street: Player [Rolders] has voted to draw the game. 2 more votes are needed to pass the draw vote.
(05:43 / All) shrimp: cuz 2 dc not okay with me
(05:43 / All) shrimp: possible 30 win


greatbeyond wrote:Maybe follow your own advice..? You are no better than shrimp, and just as toxic minus the reports lol


Here's a list of 10 people who I'm certain will confirm they enjoy having Adi in their games:

Tastay, BeepBoopBeep, Don_Killuminati, ZTX)Fiji, Occupy.WStreet, Mick, Jenny, Psyclone, Achilles, g.like3.

I urge you to find 10 people who hold the same sentiment towards shrimp. You must also ask yourself, if Adi were as bad as shrimp, why hasn't there been a single thread complaining about his behaviour whereas there have been multiple directed at the latter?

elektro
Treant
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:49 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby elektro » Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:48 pm

shrimp is pretty bad, at skill and behaviour imo. i played a game with him, a 2s and we were same team. and a team talks. i give him advices, i ask his oppinion about my build. but when i told him my oppinion he say " dude, what makes u think u can teach me, u ended last spot last season". the funny thing is he is one of less skilled players in the league, and still he thinks he knows everything better. ofc i let him know i was indeed 530 elo during season, but i ended 943 elo to be exact.

User avatar
KinG23
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3379
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:03 pm
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby KinG23 » Wed Nov 04, 2015 5:33 pm

Since this thread, I have played many games with Shrimp, Occupy, and I on the same team. There was no flaming going on, and no problems in game whatsoever. This issue seems to be resolved between these two.

I have played many games with shrimp, and enjoy my games with him, definitely an LIHL caliber player.

This thread seems to be going very off topic... either keep it related to this case or post your thoughts on the dc pens in the separate thread created.
*kisses*

cam_breezy
Donator
Posts: 302
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 6:19 am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby cam_breezy » Wed Nov 04, 2015 6:18 pm

@elektro ur a funny guy.

@artichoke you are irrelevant to this league.

@bugatti_veyron you are a known pp'er and ghoster.

User avatar
Artichoke
Forest Walker
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:26 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby Artichoke » Wed Nov 04, 2015 7:52 pm

"Everybody criticizing me is bad, irrelevant, delusional, and wrong! Don't listen to them! I'm actually a highly talented, mannered, and respectable player! Just take my word for it!"

User avatar
nabo.
Donator
Posts: 11892
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
Location: Dokdo, KOREA
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 158 times

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby nabo. » Wed Nov 04, 2015 8:48 pm

I have only skimmed through this topic because most people are talking in circles.

1) dc penalties: idc what shrimp did. He did what he did within our rules and how dc penalty system works. He probably did gain 50-80 elo, not 200 elo... Majority of dc cases are due to your technical difficulties and has little to do with shrimp. So, stop crying about him reporting others. If you want to blame something, blame how dc penalty works and suggest ideas to improve our current dc penalty system.

Shrimp has stated that he will not longer report dc penalties as often as he did (for stats). So, move on.

2) I am seeing the common "I hate shrimp" people and some stating "I see why shrimp can be xxxxxxxx after playing this ONE game with him today, etc etc". There are some who I would group with shrimp when it comes to flaming and behaviour AFFECTING the flow or atmosphere of games. You guys should know better who these individuals are. Shrimp did get reported more than these noted individuals, therefore, why I see all this drama. @cam_breezy as you noted on your post and PM, you should by now have realized that your actions in question you CHOSE to take until now were either negative or not compromisable by a large number of the lihl community. If you wish to continue playing on lihl, I highly suggest you reevaluate how you approach and communicate to others. If soon, another similar case such as this arises again, the lihl moderation team has decided to permanently unvouch you whether it is due to your overall behaviour, repating behavior/flame history, or just the fact you cannot get along with the rest of the community. For this case, shirmp is unvouched 7 days.

With everything said, despite his certain bad games, I have seen shrimp do decent on certain other games too.

3) I would also like to take this chance to note that FLAME cases will be taken a lot more seriously from now on and harsh and strict penalities will be enforced.

@cam_breezy This is a FINAL WARNING.
These users thanked the author nabo. for the post (total 2):
pewpew lasergun (Wed Nov 04, 2015 11:23 pm) • matdas (Wed Nov 04, 2015 9:11 pm)
Clan High@useast

  • Check the wiki for ENT rules and general information.
  • Talk to mods on ENT chat.
  • Host games through our bots, Manage your stats, Secure your account(s), and check your ban status on ENT LINK.

MarshMallows

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby MarshMallows » Thu Nov 05, 2015 4:17 pm

Haha! this was a good read. Shrimp you have gotten a lot better since nore vouched you, you were mid skill ent18 at that stage, so well done on improving. But you not high skill man, don't say that to people :p

Egahtrac
Forest Walker
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:09 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Shrimp behavior

Postby Egahtrac » Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:57 pm

Artichoke wrote:In fact, playing this game in general is about number 538 on my to-do list, right behind "stab myself in the eye with a rusty nail repeatedly".

So #537 on your to-do list is clearly crying on ltd in house forums about why you don't play anymore. Or is that closer to #1? ;D
These users thanked the author Egahtrac for the post:
tastay (Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:32 pm)
Egahtrac@uswest - Clan Ship
Egahtrac_Ship@uswest - Clan Ship
Ship_@useast - Clan LIHL


Return to “Processed Cases”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests