ENT Gaming

I signed to play a 3s and someone complained that they did not want to play after signing and unhosted. A complete waist of time, ofc I get sniped and can't play the next game.

I said 4 times that I wanted to play the game and not to unhost but ofc more "popular" people can do w/e they want in this league and get away with it.

a) i unhost the game how i could play with someone who wanted to go to the store.

b) adi didnt want to play i wrote him 10 times

c) i didnt saw what juba said..i was same team with zealot i wanted to play that game too..but i unhost cause wolke had a problem

{d) the chat was very diffrent than it looks..they all spamming like crazy}

Well i needet to go to the supermarket and signed cause i forgot about the time.

This report should be thrown out number one because the game was unbalanced at 18.94 / 11.06, also in the lihl channel it should have been aborted because another game was ending but achilles was afk so this 3s game essentially became a trap. 5 of the 6 players did not want to play this game and jub says every time he doesn't support any changes no matter how much it's necessary.

Egahtrac wrote:This report should be thrown out number one because the game was unbalanced at 18.94 / 11.06, also in the lihl channel it should have been aborted because another game was ending but achilles was afk so this 3s game essentially became a trap. 5 of the 6 players did not want to play this game and jub says every time he doesn't support any changes no matter how much it's necessary.

One, go read the rules please. ALL players must agree. 5/6 is not ALL players. Please go back to 3rd grade math people.

Its unbalanced, k, but this has no influence on the rule actually. Also, if players are to lazy to look whats started (2s/3s/4s) before they sign, then they shouldnt complaint afterwards.
All in all, it seems like its more of a Wolke-dodge, then an Achill unhost-abuse, since unhosting would be legit if Wolke refuses (has no time) to play.

its not about wolke, its about the illegitimate unhost. i wont be going into "ifs" cus thats just dumb.

matdas wrote:its not about wolke, its about the illegitimate unhost. i wont be going into "ifs" cus thats just dumb.

Achill MUST unhost, if Wolke refuses to play (dodges). So its no unhost-abuse ... but dodge

Edit my sentence: Achill MUST unhost, because Wolke refuses to play (dodges). So its no unhost-abuse ... but dodge
No more "if", fine now @Matdas ? ^^

but he didnt dodge... and you are going into the "ifs"

wolke clearly stated that he couldn't play. Nuff said @matdas .... zzz

Dong wrote:wolke clearly stated that he couldn't play. Nuff said @matdas .... zzz

he was still in lobby, thus dodge did not happen.

I agree with matdas.....
Wolke break no rule saying he will break a rule.
Justice intervenes to facts, like if someone says in game he will pp, if he don't , nothing can happen.

eldiablo270 wrote:I agree with matdas.....
Wolke break no rule saying he will break a rule.
Justice intervenes to facts, like if someone says in game he will pp, if he don't , nothing can happen.

Thank you.

What is irking me now is that people be trying to use Wolke as a scapegoat. Lets not beat around the bush and play the blame game. If Wolke did leave the lobby, then he would be at fault, and the unhost would be changed to dodge. I will not deny that. But it was unhosted before a dodge happened. he said "i would prefer to dodge if thats ok." Well, its never ok to dodge, in which case he did not. The game got unhosted without a reason.

@wolke any comments ?

It doesn't look like you got sniped though? You were talking when there were 7 people signed.

I don't think any wrong is done here, Wolke said he prefers to leave, then it gets unhosted and rehosted with more people able to join. As Achilles says here, he didn't do it with any ill intent, he just thought everyone wanted rehost. It happens, mistakes are made all the time. If you just signed again instead of ranting you will report you would have played a game with hardly any delay.