Halo_mauler is biased and ineffective, should stop moderating dota games
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2025 1:38 pm
Hello,
Halo_mauler is biased and ineffective as a mod. His admin calls are abnormally bad even by ent standards. He should be de-modded. If this is a strong statement, I'm sorry but it's the truth. If you need proof, see below:
1) Take this one thread a few months ago, where he banned me for "ruining" jazzy's game:
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=147413&p=565313&hilit=inshreds#p565313
He claims it was a "24 hour ban" so that I explain myself, yet there was nothing to explain. You don't ban players for explanations unless a rule was already broken. I have a rule to not engage with jazzy if he files a ban req since he just wants drama, so I refused to comment (did send halo a PM though - he kept the ban up despite my PM). FYI this was NOT ruining, it was just me making a slightly different build (not even that odd). All the deaths were in team fights defending rax. There was nothing explain, yet he banned me for an entire 24 hours!
2)
Take this example, where he blatantly ignored evidence to repeatedly claim that maphack evidence was actually a totally normal play, he seemed to ignore everyone and just hand-waved everyone who agreed it was highly suspicious (extremely unusual to have consensus for mh evidence here):
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=147434
3) He is inconsistent in bans/standards, as evidence here:
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=147419&p=565371#p565371
Due to a previous thread, halo warned me to not spam or circumvent ignore as it's very "serious" and will result in a 5 day ban next time. I decide to report that someone did exactly what he told me was serious from a previous context. His response to my report was that I'm wasting peoples' time, as this is not serious - even though he told ME he would ban ME for it. (Let me know if you need me to link to him saying exactly this to me, in another context, a few weeks before this post). He also is on record as banning another player for 'vk abuse'/ignore circumvention - something he totally hand-waved and ignored in this case. (Let me know if you need a link to him banning a player for this).
4) Ban with transparently fake reasoning
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=148156
Added "griefing" to his ban, presumably to extend it to 1 week. When explaining how this was possible when no griefing occurred, he said "grief is for acting out trying to get banned". The Party from 1984 would be proud of this circular logic.
5) Ban for "racism" yesterday
viewtopic.php?f=7&p=569867#p569867
From a neutral perspective, this is one that I felt was subjective and could understand either way. Astros' argument was solid, and made sense especially with the AI chat message screenshot. Yet I could see a little bit of the other side's argument. Therefore I was interested to see the modding result. Overall, however, I think the key piece of evidence was this: this ban was not worth processing due to the overall context (Someone reporting astros for revenge for THEIR ban, not a good faith ban request). It was just a scuffle, trash talk as happens in online games.
Then Halo chimed in, inflamed the situation more, and the worst of all? His comments made it sound like his take was 100% objective, and that there was NO way what he said wasn't absolutely correct and fool-proof, over a request I read and immediately thought was a good deal subjective. And then he proceeds to ban the guy for DAYS over nothing, while casually claiming he's just a racist and that's that.
Then in all this halo ADMITTED that he wasn't sure how to tell if it was just trash talk: "Maybe it was just trash talking but it's hard to tell between you guys" You can't even make this up.
6) Requests evidence for a ban request in the form of timestamp, calmly re-assuring that the user will be banned for breaching ENT rules. Once evidence is provided, proceeds to threaten OP to ban them and ignores the evidence:
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=147959&p=566991
He did process the ban adequately at the end, but only after 2 people called him out mid-thread asking what he was doing. You can tell he was trying to get out of it, presumably because he was lazy to go through the replay and had some weird hidden anger to take out on m4kr32.
7) Racism thread over use of **ga word.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=148492
This is a fake thread by FromCali, who just submits ban reqs on people who insult him for gameplay stuff.
Halo, being an old white man, decided to begin speaking with authority on uses of the n-word and said it's bannable, despite mikejones and multiple other people using it in games. Halo took it a step further and decided to speak specfiically to black people saying: "doesn't matter if you are black or not still not ok to say". Alright, the black community should start being dictated to by halo_mauler over their choice of words now?
This guy is bringing down the quality of dota games, and it sucks hard. I was really hoping to not say anything but it's reached a fever pitch point for me as you can tell by these 7 examples over the course of months which took me 5 mins to pull up. I'm sure there's about 10 more examples. This guy just refuses to stop moderating dota, which he doesn't know that well. He has explicitly been asked to stop moderating dota stuff. Yet he continues.
Halo_mauler is biased and ineffective as a mod. His admin calls are abnormally bad even by ent standards. He should be de-modded. If this is a strong statement, I'm sorry but it's the truth. If you need proof, see below:
1) Take this one thread a few months ago, where he banned me for "ruining" jazzy's game:
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=147413&p=565313&hilit=inshreds#p565313
He claims it was a "24 hour ban" so that I explain myself, yet there was nothing to explain. You don't ban players for explanations unless a rule was already broken. I have a rule to not engage with jazzy if he files a ban req since he just wants drama, so I refused to comment (did send halo a PM though - he kept the ban up despite my PM). FYI this was NOT ruining, it was just me making a slightly different build (not even that odd). All the deaths were in team fights defending rax. There was nothing explain, yet he banned me for an entire 24 hours!
2)
Take this example, where he blatantly ignored evidence to repeatedly claim that maphack evidence was actually a totally normal play, he seemed to ignore everyone and just hand-waved everyone who agreed it was highly suspicious (extremely unusual to have consensus for mh evidence here):
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=147434
3) He is inconsistent in bans/standards, as evidence here:
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=147419&p=565371#p565371
Due to a previous thread, halo warned me to not spam or circumvent ignore as it's very "serious" and will result in a 5 day ban next time. I decide to report that someone did exactly what he told me was serious from a previous context. His response to my report was that I'm wasting peoples' time, as this is not serious - even though he told ME he would ban ME for it. (Let me know if you need me to link to him saying exactly this to me, in another context, a few weeks before this post). He also is on record as banning another player for 'vk abuse'/ignore circumvention - something he totally hand-waved and ignored in this case. (Let me know if you need a link to him banning a player for this).
4) Ban with transparently fake reasoning
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=148156
Added "griefing" to his ban, presumably to extend it to 1 week. When explaining how this was possible when no griefing occurred, he said "grief is for acting out trying to get banned". The Party from 1984 would be proud of this circular logic.
5) Ban for "racism" yesterday
viewtopic.php?f=7&p=569867#p569867
From a neutral perspective, this is one that I felt was subjective and could understand either way. Astros' argument was solid, and made sense especially with the AI chat message screenshot. Yet I could see a little bit of the other side's argument. Therefore I was interested to see the modding result. Overall, however, I think the key piece of evidence was this: this ban was not worth processing due to the overall context (Someone reporting astros for revenge for THEIR ban, not a good faith ban request). It was just a scuffle, trash talk as happens in online games.
Then Halo chimed in, inflamed the situation more, and the worst of all? His comments made it sound like his take was 100% objective, and that there was NO way what he said wasn't absolutely correct and fool-proof, over a request I read and immediately thought was a good deal subjective. And then he proceeds to ban the guy for DAYS over nothing, while casually claiming he's just a racist and that's that.
Then in all this halo ADMITTED that he wasn't sure how to tell if it was just trash talk: "Maybe it was just trash talking but it's hard to tell between you guys" You can't even make this up.
6) Requests evidence for a ban request in the form of timestamp, calmly re-assuring that the user will be banned for breaching ENT rules. Once evidence is provided, proceeds to threaten OP to ban them and ignores the evidence:
viewtopic.php?f=25&t=147959&p=566991
He did process the ban adequately at the end, but only after 2 people called him out mid-thread asking what he was doing. You can tell he was trying to get out of it, presumably because he was lazy to go through the replay and had some weird hidden anger to take out on m4kr32.
7) Racism thread over use of **ga word.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=148492
This is a fake thread by FromCali, who just submits ban reqs on people who insult him for gameplay stuff.
Halo, being an old white man, decided to begin speaking with authority on uses of the n-word and said it's bannable, despite mikejones and multiple other people using it in games. Halo took it a step further and decided to speak specfiically to black people saying: "doesn't matter if you are black or not still not ok to say". Alright, the black community should start being dictated to by halo_mauler over their choice of words now?
This guy is bringing down the quality of dota games, and it sucks hard. I was really hoping to not say anything but it's reached a fever pitch point for me as you can tell by these 7 examples over the course of months which took me 5 mins to pull up. I'm sure there's about 10 more examples. This guy just refuses to stop moderating dota, which he doesn't know that well. He has explicitly been asked to stop moderating dota stuff. Yet he continues.