MickeyTheMousie wrote:I am starting to feel like the discussion is based upon a semantic misunderstanding. Here's my reading:
Eldryan tried to state that with the current stats JunZzi would be defined as 'inactive', since he played less than an X amount of games, not taking into account the amount of time vouched, and what can be expected in the future.
JunZzi sees activity in a relative sense, that is, games played relative to the amount of time played, and expectancy of how many games played, and not taking into account the absolute number of games played, and is active in this way.
So while JunZzi can be seen inactive when viewed in an absolute sense, he is (very) active in a relative sense. This means nobody is right nor wrong.
I'm off to bed now
I said for new vouches, 30 games / month is expected if in middle of season. I did take into account time vouched. I didn't assume he is going to play any amount, or even tell him he was going to be unvouched or was getting a point against him until he asked and started exclaiming power abuse. Then I told him the standards. I'd definitely say I am right here. He is only wrong in where he lied about what I said in the OP. However, neither here nor there. Don't think it's about right and wrong in the argument, as it's completely petty.
Archiving.