Fana

[fanatismo]

I want to play again in lihl, send the screen shots of the game to the mods, I could not send screenshots before because I had enough knowledge to that, well now I have thx

[Krumme]

I like fanatismo and I believe him when he says he didn't know how to send a screenshot
A permanent ban is a bit harsh imo. - but again I am not a mod but I really think fanatismo should be given a second chance
With that being said I still think you need to punish him hard (more than a week and less than permanent) for not being able to make a screenshot - it's not the first time this has happened in lihl and we all know the rules

[supersexyy]

Eldryan posted that you've passed 2/8 of his SS tests. And the most recent SS test which puts you at 2/9?

[Krumme]

2/8?? But Drahque got perma unbanned for failing 1 ss test - which I thought would be the standards after that?
Can someone ( @eldryan ) explain to the masses how this can be?

Well this changes everything - if this was a 1 time thing (which I thought it was) I had mercy but if he has failed 6/8 ss test there should be given no mercy since that is just intentionally breaking the rules

[Diablo_]

Drahque was maphacking, thus the perma ban.
According to Eldryan Fanatismo failed to send screenshots about six times so far, while he did send about 2 times, which would also show that he generally knows how to do it.
His case is still being discussed tho, so no final decision is made yet.

[willie64]

Id say make it simple, ss test should be send within 5 minutes. Fail = 3 day ban and climbing if its occuring more often. No discussion is needed i think, uploading a ss is easy as fuck. People that can use gproxy can most definately use paint...

Edit: and unban fana, give everyone a fresh start on that matter.

[aRt)Y]

Edit: and unban fana, give everyone a fresh start on that matter.

And the arguments for doing so are?

[supersexyy]

Fana revouched 14/03/14 (2 week ban).

Note to all: Failure to produce SS in future tests may result in permanent bans.

[iightfyre]

Note to all: Failure to produce SS in future tests may result in permanent bans.

Just wanted to reiterate this

[ZTX)Fiji]

Mi amigo no maphacker! le encanta llamas

Fana doesnt MH... now if you take a look at some replays of Cyto. then ull see how a Maphacker plays ;D
I have been used to playing with maphackers - cancer to wc3, and Fana has not at all been acting weird - or strived for #1 spots... Maphakers tend to be tallentless desperate noobs that seek aknowledgement ^^ when you think about Fana, do you associate him with people like this ? NO! Ergo, his got no symptoms either. Id like to play more with him^^

[Diablo_]

No one is saying that he is/was maphacking, if we would think so he would ofc not be revouched. But he still broke rules by not sending screenshots thus he is unvouched for 2 weeks and we will take failures to send screenshots much more serious from now on.

[eldryan]

I posted the emails with his ss tests. access it yourself. he failed a number.

For the record I think cyto. should be given a chance in LIHL - he does MH in other bots, but so have many other members of LIHL. if mods actually ss test, maybe he can be shown innocent. no reason not to trial someone who is obviously qualified to play if he's willing to put in the time for SS testing.

[skillerinstinct]

Why should there be any tolerance for people who mh? And cyto uses glitch abuse on the 1v1 bot too. It is pretty obvious, what kind of person he is. You want such in this community?

Some people just have a problem to see the difference of playing tricky and cheating/playing unfair.

[eldryan]

Why should there be any tolerance for people who mh? And cyto uses glitch abuse on the 1v1 bot too. It is pretty obvious, what kind of person he is. You want such in this community?

Some people just have a problem to see the difference of playing tricky and cheating/playing unfair.

every mod also uses glitch abuse if you mean anti stuck abusing. it's legal, and if we removed every1 from LIHL that uses it we would be unvouching a huge amount of people. Personally I would say that's being tricky and not cheating in what cyto. is doing.

I don't know many people who, at one point, haven't used MH. In other bots it's not a big deal, and so why wouldn't you use it in those cases? That's not a mark against him.

[iightfyre]

1. Why is Cyto. being brought up in a topic named "fana"?

2. Cyto. had plenty of discussion on his app.. if you care to review reference this -- > https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=77&t=25824

3. Being that this thread was about Fana's unvouch period, it has been resolved and decision has been made. I am archiving this thread.

PS -

I don't know many people who, at one point, haven't used MH. In other bots it's not a big deal, and so why wouldn't you use it in those cases? That's not a mark against him.

[spoiler="Me being rude, sorry"]This is purely speculative Eld and I think you are being paranoid.[/spoiler] I, for one, have never used MH on any bots, ever. I have been playing WC3 since the day it was released. I'm sure plenty of players who have a conscience have never used MH. It, imo, IS a mark against him and his character. Anyway, I digress.

Archiving - if you wish to debate MH use or Cyto's app please start a new thread that is topic-appropriate. Thanks.