[DOTA] chan @ US east

[matt967]

Your Warcraft III username: cheetos
Violator's Warcraft III username: chan , rent-a-nlgga
Game name or map name: [ent] dota apem us/ca #76
Stats page link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 148611.w3g
Rule player violated: Chan - numerous moments he fountain sat
rent-a-nlgga - im not sure if its banable but he ruined game early.
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer):
Any further thoughts: After we lost mid lane Chan decides to fountain sit till he realizes he can be banned. he comes out of afk and helps defend for a bit then goes back to fountain sitting numerous times. Regarding rent-a-nlgga if you review replay as well as the chat logs you may or may not see it as an early game ruin. If you share the same view as me then great because I clearly feel he deserves a ban for throwing a game worth 20 elo. Thanks

[aqf]

@matt967 !approved Chan banned 5 days for afk grieving

Chan starts afk grieving at around 35 minutes, but does come to defend bot and dies. Then gets a kill top, but what really made his afk grieving clear was his chat:

(41:37 / Allied) Chan: i gave up
(41:38 / Allied) Chan: a while ago

(edit) rent-a-nlgga does this quite often, and I found another game where he basically forces himself mid when someone else is there: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #97

I think his behavior constitutes trolling, and IMO the only way to deal with this type of player is to give him solo mid and hope that he does actually try to win. What happened to you was an example of what happens when you try to challenge a troll.

rent-a-nlgga banned 7 days intentional game ruining in your game and attempting to ruin many other games via trolling. I'm sure if I look deeper in to this there will be a disturbing trend.