Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/4448745/
Game Name: [ent] dota apem us/ca #29
Your Warcraft III Username: Bierberlicious (i forefeited and afk-ed to report these offenders; because these players ruined the game and it was over).
Violator's Warcraft III Username: wqeqw
Violated Rule(s): ruining game
Violator's Warcraft III Username: imtheshortbus
Violated Rule(s): refusing to votekick; tantamount to game ruining
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): last 10 min of game
Any further thoughts: wqeqw is unable to cope with the game dynamics and rages with ironwood branches. Please give him a range ban which is deserved of such action. He is proud and says that he can just reset his modem to escape the ban. imtheshortbus, while understandable, ruined the game partially too, due to his unpausing and refusal to votekick. Do include his other allies who did not votekick if possible.
[DOTA] imtheshortbus (not votekicking) and wqeqw (ruining)
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Resource Storage
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 4:07 pm
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: [DOTA] imtheshortbus (not votekicking) and wqeqw (ruinin
wqeqw banned.
[470] 35:56 [All] daye1114 (Slark): A votekick against player [wqeqw] has been started by player [Bierberlicious]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.
[475] 35:59 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [mosquito] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 6 more votes are needed to pass.
[477] 35:59 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [Hybrid.Theory] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 5 more votes are needed to pass.
[479] 35:59 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [veryintelijent] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 4 more votes are needed to pass.
[481] 36:00 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [ItWillCome] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 3 more votes are needed to pass.
[533] 36:38 [All] daye1114 (Slark): A votekick against player [wqeqw] has expired.
[568] 37:47 [All] daye1114 (Slark): A votekick against player [wqeqw] has been started by player [veryintelijent]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.
[572] 37:50 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [bluee] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 6 more votes are needed to pass.
[576] 37:53 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [ItWillCome] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 5 more votes are needed to pass.
[578] 37:54 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [Hybrid.Theory] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 4 more votes are needed to pass.
[605] 38:46 [All] daye1114 (Slark): A votekick against player [wqeqw] has expired.
Banned:
imtheshortbus
jh00l
daye1114
[470] 35:56 [All] daye1114 (Slark): A votekick against player [wqeqw] has been started by player [Bierberlicious]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.
[475] 35:59 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [mosquito] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 6 more votes are needed to pass.
[477] 35:59 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [Hybrid.Theory] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 5 more votes are needed to pass.
[479] 35:59 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [veryintelijent] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 4 more votes are needed to pass.
[481] 36:00 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [ItWillCome] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 3 more votes are needed to pass.
[533] 36:38 [All] daye1114 (Slark): A votekick against player [wqeqw] has expired.
[568] 37:47 [All] daye1114 (Slark): A votekick against player [wqeqw] has been started by player [veryintelijent]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.
[572] 37:50 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [bluee] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 6 more votes are needed to pass.
[576] 37:53 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [ItWillCome] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 5 more votes are needed to pass.
[578] 37:54 [All] daye1114 (Slark): Player [Hybrid.Theory] voted to kick player [wqeqw]. 4 more votes are needed to pass.
[605] 38:46 [All] daye1114 (Slark): A votekick against player [wqeqw] has expired.
Banned:
imtheshortbus
jh00l
daye1114
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 59 guests