incomplete picture

Looking for your appeal? Approved or denied appeals are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

pwnd.lazy
Forest Walker
Posts: 129
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:01 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

incomplete picture

Postby pwnd.lazy » Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:02 am

Your Warcraft III username: pwnd.lazy
Realm/Gateway: europe
Why are you banned: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=43446
Why you should be unbanned:

Im very sorry I let myselfe into this 'flamewar'. I should have just ignored this guy, instead I wrongly tried to votekick this guy 4 times. I wont do that again. As a little defence, he started it, but I know thats no reason.

overview about his 'communications':

most important:
does not appear you did anything wrong, despite double mid both of you were continuing to play.
what about he voted to kick me first? or instead of playing qq-about mid whole game?

(00:13 / Allied) Remes: me mid
(00:15 / All) pwnd.lazy: -reroll
(00:23 / Allied) John_93: stfu
(00:25 / Allied) John_93: me mid
(00:30 / Allied) Remes: ok rambo
(00:31 / Allied) pwnd.lazy: STFU
(00:33 / Allied) pwnd.lazy: ME MID

...

(06:38 / Allied) Coffee: roll for it
(06:39 / Allied) John_93: purple gtfo
(06:41 / Allied) John_93: trash
(06:42 / Allied) pwnd.lazy: !roll
(06:42 / All) JoKur: Random result: 4 (from 0 to 5).
(06:45 / Allied) pwnd.lazy: 4

...[cmt] he never ever rolled

(07:10 / All) JoKur: Player [John_93] voted to kick player [pwnd.lazy].

(07:31 / All) pwnd.lazy: roll
(07:33 / All) pwnd.lazy: or i stay
(09:19 / Allied) pwnd.lazy: we roll highest stays

...

(09:38 / Allied) pwnd.lazy: !votekick john

...

(10:43 / Allied) John_93: !votekick pwnd
(10:43 / All) JoKur: A votekick against player [pwnd.lazy] has been

my further vk are a result of his constant anoying flames. one votekick almost passed, not because I spammed but because he was freaking anoying and really bad.

anyways, I didnt votekick because he was noob or bad, but because he started (actually one other guy but he voted, didnt realize that at the time) and then because he was not playing but super busy telling me what an idiot I am...

I think it is a legit situation to start a VOTEkick.

I am in chat, open for discussion :)

Stealer
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3160
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:37 pm
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: incomplete picture

Postby Stealer » Sun Nov 09, 2014 6:35 pm

@Agreements
I didn't get a pm/notification from you.
Anyways,
1.5.4.2 Defense of the Ancients
    Votekick abuse (1-7 days).

I may be no math major but 1<4<7.
I see no reason not to try to go on the heavy side to curb undesired behavior.

----

Anyways, you seem like a reasonable person who got carried away I'll knock down the duration to 12h from now.

Stealer
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3160
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:37 pm
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: incomplete picture

Postby Stealer » Sun Nov 09, 2014 7:12 pm

Knocking duration down to 0h.

Best be on best behavior as you do have some recent games with votekicks w/out good reason.
ex. http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 618618.w3g
(08:31 / Allied) muffin1234: first time im playing haha
(08:40 / Allied) muffin1234: i got this game at a internet café


Return to “Processed Appeals”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 88 guests