Worker Stacking.
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: Worker Stacking.
It stacks multiple workers on an area of 1x1. Usually in places where the titan can not nuke them.
It is ban-able.
It is ban-able.
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 834
- Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 8:16 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: Worker Stacking.
Worker stacking in general is ban-able. It does _not_ matter if you stack in a nukeable _or_ unnukeable spot. It is a glitch and falls under the general rules anyway.
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Worker Stacking.
@art)y @cambrioleuse Official ID rule: worker stacking in an un-nuke-able spot in a base.
May want to change that as it leads to thinking worker stacking is only bannable when un-nuka-able.
May want to change that as it leads to thinking worker stacking is only bannable when un-nuka-able.
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: Worker Stacking.
Loud stacking (worker stacking with the loud error sounds) or worker stacking in an un-nuke-able spot in a base.
Rule is clear enough. One should know what worker stacking is before trying to change the rule.
Rule is clear enough. One should know what worker stacking is before trying to change the rule.
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Worker Stacking.
@art)y You are implying worker stacking is impossible to do without making loud error sound.
One should try to do it before telling others what it is.
Therefore worker stacking in a nukable spot without making a loud sound is obviously not breaking any rules.
One should try to do it before telling others what it is.
Therefore worker stacking in a nukable spot without making a loud sound is obviously not breaking any rules.
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: Worker Stacking.
It is a glitch. It falls under the general rules and is ban-able.
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Worker Stacking.
We definitely think differently, yes it is a glitch but there is a rule made for it that precisely says it must be un-nuke-able to be banned. To me that means that even tho it is a glitch, it is acceptable if it is nuke-able, it's an exeption to the rule of no glitch allowed just like itemjump is.
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Worker Stacking.
@cambrioleuse I am not stacking god i can only put 5 on top of each other without sound, do that in a 5 worker spot and there you got your 25 workers
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests