report

[SLSGuennter]

yolo.style did sell lobster (85 gold unit) between lvl 6 and 7, so he leaked more. this definetly is against the rules. also he had only 500 value then, for 7.
600 value aqua on wolke, this is lower then "normal" yolo imo, but can be ok, though doing this with no holder in team is suspicious for rule-breack imo.

https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=5234430

[Wolke]

my suggestion: new rule, even if you hold with that value you have to build more, if not guennter reports you for holdingclog or something
I feal sorry for you if you think 600 value is suspicious for clog @6

[SLSGuennter]

the 600 val on 7 (50% of recommend) are low, but like i said, u can do it if u want, and u did hold 8 anyway, BUT selling 85 value pre7 is not ok ^^

[ZTX)Fiji]

Lol I'll do wtf I want with my lobsters if I had any pre - 7 Xd unless ofc if it would kill me - ect if you for some reason have aquas and a lobster - then you sell the lobster to get 7/5 and then still hold 8 ect ect then no harm has been done - you just got rly fat hæhæ

[MrTown[UC]]

I had the same case with wolfwarrior as ingame referee. I sold 4 crabs pre 7 and was down at 180 value. I asked wolfy before and he said its ok.

[SLSGuennter]

@ztx)fiji lobster and aqua werent on same player ^^
@mrtown[uc] i dont know what were the circumstances in ur game. but in this game, the pushed like hell and this sell did even increase the clog and so the lvltime and asfaik this got banned. (do not sell more then 50 gold unit except the delay ot something like this hutzu stated)

[Achillesgr6]

quennter this song is for you to relax!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_OmSaMmpyk

[SLSGuennter]

thx for the song achilles, but if Gunther could be here he would tell u: why we have rules, if we dont play accordingly to them?

[Diablo_]

Crabs are meant to be sold at one point. Also they didn't leak much on 5 and 6. A huge leak on level 7 will ofc still happen with 4x yolo vs send, no matter what.
It looks like our new rule is heavily flawed and leads to a lot confusion (I'm not even sure if all mods see it the same way) ^^
I guess we will have to make this all clearer asap.

Anyway, thanks for reporting, but this game definitely doesn't fall into our interpretation of the rule.

[MichaelSong]

@Mrtown[UC]
I still remember that game which I was observing and you asked me can you?
but problem was it was lvl 2 which I remember.
You had 1 komodo(when I'm observing tho.) and 1 bottom feeder at lvl 2.
I thought you were asking to build another thing after selling bottom feeder at lvl 2.
If we don't accept players to sell 85 gold every round such as lvl 2, it is just unreasonable to play with it.
I didn't said it's okay to sell all 4 bottom feeders at lvl 6 and go 180 value(1 komodo only at lvl 7)
And long as I remember, that game eneded at lvl 7 which town almost full leaked and they're dead because they blowed 2 heals at lvl 5 already

@Guennter
I would look over replay.
According to the rule it is purely abuse when following lines, if he didn't build nothing after selling his bottom feeder(85 gold).

However, Since I wasn't mod when that rule was deciding, cannot say much
and personally the only tower I want to give exception at building rule would be bottom feeder.
It's characteristic of tower(ability) is to give you 90% payback comepared to other towers.

If we just fit building rule to this tower(bottom feeder) also, nobody who is yoloing or holding or whatever won't likely to build this tower.
But have to admit that this is against the building rule,
So, I will discuss this one about fellows mod to give exception only in bottom feeder.
Sorry for inconvenience.