Ban appeal
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Basic Tree
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:02 am
Ban appeal
Warcraft III username: sohorrible
Realm: uswest
Gamename: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #40
Bot username: http://clanent.net/findstats.php?id=1001580
Situation: Banned for refusing to vote
Why you should be unbanned: The player that the votekick was started against was initially 0-1 when multiple
votekicks started against him(3 I believe); I saw no reasoning for this. Same thing when he went 0-2. Eventually he went 0-6(we did kick him at this point) however your bot clearly says not to kick players just because they're new to the game; according to nz.death's post he has 347 games, this was never stated in the game as far as I know. I did not check his stats, nor did I care to do so, he just seemed like a beginner.
I asked what rule he was breaking multiple times and did not get a response. The player was not purposely feeding and I saw no reason to kick a player because he was just bad. He literally died within a stun 100% to dead multiple times to myself and ancient apparition while his lane-mate left him to die.
Realm: uswest
Gamename: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #40
Bot username: http://clanent.net/findstats.php?id=1001580
Situation: Banned for refusing to vote
Why you should be unbanned: The player that the votekick was started against was initially 0-1 when multiple
votekicks started against him(3 I believe); I saw no reasoning for this. Same thing when he went 0-2. Eventually he went 0-6(we did kick him at this point) however your bot clearly says not to kick players just because they're new to the game; according to nz.death's post he has 347 games, this was never stated in the game as far as I know. I did not check his stats, nor did I care to do so, he just seemed like a beginner.
I asked what rule he was breaking multiple times and did not get a response. The player was not purposely feeding and I saw no reason to kick a player because he was just bad. He literally died within a stun 100% to dead multiple times to myself and ancient apparition while his lane-mate left him to die.
Re: Ban appeal
But yet even when he was 0-5 then 0-6 then 1-6 then 1-7 and running into you guys without even trying to go back, You didnt feel the need to !yes the votekick?
You are banned for two days because of it, You and yellow were the only two not to accept the votekick. When they started the !votekick on his first death was wrong and youll see not many actually voted.
But when he was proving that he was just going to continue to ruin the game by feeding you still felt a need not to votekick him. Maybe you just wanted an easy win which you got after feeding off him.
EDIT : Two of your team even started 3 of the votekicks and yet you still didnt vote, I even told you in-game that he was not a new player, And another one of my team told you he was 500 elo. You dont get an elo like that from been new to the game. It takes alot of games.
You are banned for two days because of it, You and yellow were the only two not to accept the votekick. When they started the !votekick on his first death was wrong and youll see not many actually voted.
But when he was proving that he was just going to continue to ruin the game by feeding you still felt a need not to votekick him. Maybe you just wanted an easy win which you got after feeding off him.
EDIT : Two of your team even started 3 of the votekicks and yet you still didnt vote, I even told you in-game that he was not a new player, And another one of my team told you he was 500 elo. You dont get an elo like that from been new to the game. It takes alot of games.
- ForMaDawgS
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:28 am
- Location: San Antonio Tx
-
- Basic Tree
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:02 am
Re: Ban appeal
I killed him once for FB(100% hp to dead in a stun) and then 1-2 times in a team battle. He did not just run into us for any of those kills I was involved in. I did not see anyone say he was 500 elo; am I expected to read everything in a pub?
After about 6-7 votekicks when he was no less than 0-3, I start to ignore that crap. I do not keep track of my own record generally, especially not my enemies. I could care less if my teammate goes 0-7, same regarding the other team. The point stands that he was votekicked, I don't recall his record when he was kicked. Yet I'm banned for not kicking him?
You're simply angry that I brought up you ending a game for no reason before. Also, it was an easy win either way; you fed me more kills than your "feeder".
After about 6-7 votekicks when he was no less than 0-3, I start to ignore that crap. I do not keep track of my own record generally, especially not my enemies. I could care less if my teammate goes 0-7, same regarding the other team. The point stands that he was votekicked, I don't recall his record when he was kicked. Yet I'm banned for not kicking him?
You're simply angry that I brought up you ending a game for no reason before. Also, it was an easy win either way; you fed me more kills than your "feeder".
-
- Basic Tree
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:02 am
Re: Ban appeal
ForMaDawgS wrote:but your not suppose to kick people who arn't intentionally feeding... imo unban him
That was my understanding of the rules as well.
Re: Ban appeal
Have you watched the replay forma? Dont unban him, He broke the rules, Even his team knew he was feeding. I know you dont like me forma and your doing this to spite me again.
The ban stays until an unbiased admin reviews it.
The ban stays until an unbiased admin reviews it.
- ForMaDawgS
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:28 am
- Location: San Antonio Tx
Re: Ban appeal
your biased by being in that game i think an unbiased admin should review game and check it before you been since you are kinda of new so ya you may not know fair.
also you'll see his cs and he was kicked at 15 mins in 27 cs isnt bad when end game 28 mins you have 54 cs
and i am not doing this spite out of you i am simply doing this cause i was reading the appeal. and i had stated in my last post
"imo"
you jumped the gun and accused me of being biased
also you'll see his cs and he was kicked at 15 mins in 27 cs isnt bad when end game 28 mins you have 54 cs
and i am not doing this spite out of you i am simply doing this cause i was reading the appeal. and i had stated in my last post
"imo"
you jumped the gun and accused me of being biased
Re: Ban appeal
Thats nice forma, I dont care if im new, And he was warned in game to vote or be banned, He chose to ignore that. As you can see in the chat log or in game that he know's this and after been told that the guy was 500 he in allied chat type ROFL.
Dont not unban him, The ban stays until someone else reviews this.
Dont not unban him, The ban stays until someone else reviews this.
Re: Ban appeal
Get a grip, If you unban him then ill ban him again if you want to be a child about it. If you have a problem with me then talk to me about it, Or sit down and shut up.
Why dont you go and actually do some ban requests or do you sit and wait until i post something and have to try and undermind me everytime, Kind of like SD_MIMI.
Why dont you go and actually do some ban requests or do you sit and wait until i post something and have to try and undermind me everytime, Kind of like SD_MIMI.
- ForMaDawgS
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:28 am
- Location: San Antonio Tx
- ForMaDawgS
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:28 am
- Location: San Antonio Tx
Re: Ban appeal
My personal opinion is this, we were all scrub once. There is a difference between someone intentionally feeding and someone who just plain sucks. If we are to enforce kicking people because they just suck then we might as well kick anyone below 1k elo on sight from our team. Seems more abusive to kick than not to. Yeah, it sucks when you have an idiot on your team but it happens. Atleast he was 1-7 and not 0-10 (which I have seen many many times). If kicking someone just because they suck becomes a must, you are going to have quite a large amount of abuse.
I for one think that he should be unbanned. You get shit players on your team, it happens. Yes it sucks but no one has to kick him for being a crappy player. This is a public game of dota, not a HR, not a private game. He obviously wasn't feeding for the sake of feeding.
JM2CW
I for one think that he should be unbanned. You get shit players on your team, it happens. Yes it sucks but no one has to kick him for being a crappy player. This is a public game of dota, not a HR, not a private game. He obviously wasn't feeding for the sake of feeding.
JM2CW
Queen of Abuse
Re: Ban appeal
When players feel that a certain person on their team is dragging them down, they have the right to votekick him and the majority vote rules. On more than two occasions, you were in the way of the final votekick - why you were so hesitant in kicking him I'm not sure. He didn't even really talk that game or let anyone know if he cared at all. So if his teammates and the majority of your teammates agreed to kick him - why not just do it? consider this a warning.
Ban appeal approved this time, moving to processed.
Ban appeal approved this time, moving to processed.
- cyberpunk
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 4866
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:59 am
- Location: Em suas asas borboleta amarela.
Re: Ban appeal
Imho, both are wrong.
Scourge did abuse on vk at the beginning of the game.
In this moment
[spoiler=Chat log]2:01 [Allies] 12-3.4 (King): !votekick killer
2:01 [All] sohorrible (Eredar): A votekick against player [killer07] has been started by player [12-3.4]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.
2:01 [All] sohorrible (Eredar): Type !yes to vote.
2:04 [Allies] 12-3.4 (King): !yes
2:11 [Allies] cr33per (Kaldr): gonna pull
2:14 [Allies] cr33per (Kaldr): don't die to double stuns
2:15 [All] 12-3.4 (King): pls kick the feeder
2:21 [All] eatpooandlive (Slithice): 0-1?
2:24 [All] eatpooandlive (Slithice): shutup[/spoiler]I want to remember you noobs are allowed to play
Sentinel
Some players recognized pink as feeder later.
The ban was valid imo.
Since the player is appealing for his ban, i think it should be reduced.
Scourge did abuse on vk at the beginning of the game.
In this moment
[spoiler=Chat log]2:01 [Allies] 12-3.4 (King): !votekick killer
2:01 [All] sohorrible (Eredar): A votekick against player [killer07] has been started by player [12-3.4]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.
2:01 [All] sohorrible (Eredar): Type !yes to vote.
2:04 [Allies] 12-3.4 (King): !yes
2:11 [Allies] cr33per (Kaldr): gonna pull
2:14 [Allies] cr33per (Kaldr): don't die to double stuns
2:15 [All] 12-3.4 (King): pls kick the feeder
2:21 [All] eatpooandlive (Slithice): 0-1?
2:24 [All] eatpooandlive (Slithice): shutup[/spoiler]I want to remember you noobs are allowed to play
Sentinel
Some players recognized pink as feeder later.
The ban was valid imo.
Since the player is appealing for his ban, i think it should be reduced.
[spoiler=Links to find ur ban]Link to banlist
Link to ENT Link[/spoiler]
I don't answer private messages that should be public questions. Use the forum
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests