Ok.
Since you made complaint, I would go describe more in details why I made this judgement.
![Image](https://imageproxy.entgaming.net/http://imageproxy.entgaming.net/http://i.imgur.com/sS7Kdh6.png)
This is just small part of what I posted.
As I mentioned at that post, Futhermore, I didn't count on 5 although your team leaked huge amount of hawks in level 5.
You just cut small part of whole post and going come to complain seems like making the mistake of hasty generalization.
Please keep reading whole post.
Further explanation about judgement in-game: You definitely knew you will leak hard at level 6 if you don't build after level 5 is finished, and mentioning like these statesment:
Team West wrote:(07:34 / Allied) Achillesgr: push <<<<< when level 5 is running, you said "push" means equal meaning to
don't build for level 6 since you cannot push lumberjack and build towers in same time.
(07:35 / Allied) Achillesgr:
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
(11:31 / Allied) elektro-: =))
(11:41 / Allied) elektro-: go hold 6
(11:42 / Allied) elektro-: pls
(11:47 / Allied) elektro-: so they dont complain
(11:49 / Allied) Achillesgr: yea
(11:50 / Allied) Achillesgr: i build <<< you said "I build" and you actually didn't build much enough. You had aqua and ok, let's judge your pushing would be better at level 6, your team needed at least one holder, so shouldn't be accused for 4x clogging.
(11:57 / Allied) Achillesgr: i dont care if they complain <<< For me, by stating this means "opponents have chance to complain about our decisions" and "I don't care if they complain" which proves you know your team will gonna clog in the game.
Besides these chat issues, it will be clearly acknowledged if you go look over your replay.
You're not new player in LIHL.
You should have known that there was long dicussion about
intentional 4x clogging and you can see majority of LIHL players agreed to ban intentional 4x clogging and Hutzu,Diablo_ made new rule to prohibit 4x clogging.
For me,
you didn't follow the rules apparently and complaining with non-logical grounds seems invalid complaint.We are on discussion of "What is regarded as intentional clogging" by LIHL Moderators and will make clear standards about "intentional clogging."
Before that please read
this for knowing glimpse of it.
Any more opinion would be gladly welcomed.
Edit: Rules are for everyone, there is no exception whether you're privileged or not.
“He who is not contented with what he has, would not be contented with what he would like to have.” - Socrates