Suggestion regarding bans

Moderator: LIHL Staff

Psyclone
Treant
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:37 pm
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Suggestion regarding bans

Postby Psyclone » Sat Mar 21, 2015 4:53 pm

Hi everyone

Since it is very hard to find enough players to start a game, I thought of substituting bans with a harder elo punishment. Because when a team of three people gets banned for 3 days, this is in fact a punishment also for the other lihl members since its harder to start a game. Just my 2 cents.

Cheers

User avatar
ArMeDaNdDeAdLy
Treant
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:58 pm
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Suggestion regarding bans

Postby ArMeDaNdDeAdLy » Sat Mar 21, 2015 5:42 pm

To sum it up cause this have been discussed a lot in the past
a)cant be done
b)Will fuck up the elo which represent each players skill

Krumme
Treant Protector
Posts: 973
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:30 pm
Location: Denmark
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Suggestion regarding bans

Postby Krumme » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:13 pm

This has been talked over a million times @psyclone and it wont be changed as ELO is a way to show skill and therefor more elo punishment would ruin that.
So I have one answer to your question - STOP BREAKING THE RULES!? Dissapointing to see LIHL players breaking rules (apart from the new clog rule which isn't bulletproof)

Psyclone
Treant
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:37 pm
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Suggestion regarding bans

Postby Psyclone » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:19 pm

Just to clarify @Krumme: I didn't break any rule and I never got banned here so far. Was a simple suggestion, so calm your tits.

Btw: If you see ELO as a genuine indicator for skill, why do you allow DC Pen?

Krumme
Treant Protector
Posts: 973
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:30 pm
Location: Denmark
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Suggestion regarding bans

Postby Krumme » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:30 pm

You prefer being banned for one day every time you DC @psyclone ? no I didn't think so. So until you actually have something intelligent to say please don't say anything.
The dc pen is there to
1. Punish people so they wont DC again (and in the end to prevent someone gaining anything from plugging their internet)
2. To give the players that have lost time and a chance of winning the game something back

More elo for dc penalty would ruin the ELO system even more.

Please do feel free to add a intelligent response if you are capable of such.

elektro
Treant
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:49 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Suggestion regarding bans

Postby elektro » Sat Mar 21, 2015 6:40 pm

well i think each player could disconnect pre lvl 20 2 or 3 times, that remaining to be discussed. after that limit we could apply the dc penalty, with higher dc penalty if necessary. I thought about this one thinking not all players rage quits. I got 4 dc penalty (-83 elo) one of them for dc lvl 1. i used to have a proplem with my laptop and if i had been playing for more than 2 3 hours my warcraf got stucked, that happened all 4 times. I managed to fix that it was an update for my video card. thats my call, dont know if u think its smart enough.

Psyclone
Treant
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:37 pm
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Suggestion regarding bans

Postby Psyclone » Sat Mar 21, 2015 7:02 pm

Krumme wrote:You prefer being banned for one day every time you DC @psyclone ? no I didn't think so. So until you actually have something intelligent to say please don't say anything.
The dc pen is there to
1. Punish people so they wont DC again (and in the end to prevent someone gaining anything from plugging their internet)
2. To give the players that have lost time and a chance of winning the game something back

More elo for dc penalty would ruin the ELO system even more.

Please do feel free to add a intelligent response if you are capable of such.


Haha you're an amazing guy. "DC Pen people so they don't DC again." Dude, do you have a master's degree in hermeneutics? Obviously not. DC Pen does not (sic!) stabilize your internet connection.

The 2 points you state aren't really answering my (obviously rhethoric) question: DC has nothing to do with skill. Point. So it should not be implemented according to inherent logic of the 'skill representing argument' by armed.
Last edited by aRt)Y on Sat Mar 21, 2015 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: If you want your suggestion to be taken serious, dont post such pictures.

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: Suggestion regarding bans

Postby aRt)Y » Sat Mar 21, 2015 7:12 pm

Psyclone wrote:DC Pen does not (sic!) stabilize your internet connection.
You didn't understand what he says. Punishing players with ELO (in this case due to the frequency) reduces the overall disconnect rate because players are supposed to use re-connection tools or will stop plugging out because they are afraid of using ELO.

Psyclone wrote:The 2 points you state aren't really answering my (obviously rhethoric) question: DC has nothing to do with skill. Point. So it should not be implemented according to inherent logic of the 'skill representing argument' by armed.
That's per se correct and many suggestions have already been denied for that very reason.

So would you consider actual unvouch durations as a proper solution?
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition

Diablo_
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3180
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 10:26 pm
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 145 times

Re: Suggestion regarding bans

Postby Diablo_ » Sat Mar 21, 2015 11:05 pm

The posted comments already answer everything.

1) We won't use Elo penalties instead of temporary unvouches for reasons posted above.
2) DC penalties are a mean to reduce overall disconnects which needs to be done since disconnects destroy a huge part of the fun. It should also slightly reward the players who wasted their time. Dc penalty vs a temp unvouch is a legit discussion, but we decided several times that we see dc penalties as more effective and fairer.

Archiving, thanks for the suggestion anyway.
-----
LIHL player parser, a tool to automatically parse LIHL players' Elo and create reports for it: CLICK


Return to “LIHL Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests