Unhost Rule discussion

Moderator: LIHL Staff

How many people should have to agree to be able to unhost a game?

Poll ended at Mon Mar 23, 2015 7:03 pm

Everyone (4 for 2s, 6 for 3s, 8 for 4s)
7
50%
All but one (3 for 2s, 5 for 3s, 7 for 4s)
7
50%
 
Total votes: 14

Krumme
Treant Protector
Posts: 973
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:30 pm
Location: Denmark
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Unhost Rule discussion

Postby Krumme » Tue Mar 17, 2015 3:15 am

If this is the case @matdas then I don't think this rule would be very effective. Alot of people are tabbed out until game starts or simply doesn't care what happens -> game would just start as more than 1 person wouldn't vote yes.

User avatar
matdas
ENT Staff
Posts: 2805
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:38 am
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Re: Unhost Rule discussion

Postby matdas » Tue Mar 17, 2015 3:44 am

That doesn't make sense. If you want people to vote for unhost, then they must clearly state yes or no. if they don't say either or, then they don't vote. Are you saying that: 6 votes yes, 1 vote no, one "tabbed out" that the game should be unhosted? If so, then that is completely flawed logic. Since only 7 voted and one said no within those votes, the unhosting cannot accur because only 7 people voted when 8 votes are needed to have a decision. Even if its 7 yes and one "tabbed out" for no vote, then the game cannot be unhosted.

What i am saying: All players must vote. Not sure how complicated that it.

Krumme
Treant Protector
Posts: 973
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:30 pm
Location: Denmark
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Unhost Rule discussion

Postby Krumme » Tue Mar 17, 2015 4:43 am

I think we are talking about kinda the same but not exactly.
My point being that you can't force people to vote as they are not neccesarily interested in doing so as other things might be more interesting.

If you need all players to vote to get the unhost (even if only 7 is needed) then it probably wont happen. There will in many cases be someone not paying attention or not reading chat or simply just keen on not speaking up. So a guy that doesn't vote should be a "yes" if you want this rule to make real work. If not then I don't see the point in making this rule as I think respect for each other is more effective in this scenario.

User avatar
matdas
ENT Staff
Posts: 2805
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:38 am
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Re: Unhost Rule discussion

Postby matdas » Tue Mar 17, 2015 5:00 am

Or instead of allowing people to unhost, make them play the game, if by chance at the start of the game they decide to draw and rehost a different type, then the draw vote would be consistent with what i am saying...

eldryan
Plague Treant
Posts: 1695
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:44 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Unhost Rule discussion

Postby eldryan » Tue Mar 17, 2015 6:41 am

I'm pretty sure a draw of that type can't pass, as observers can't !draw to supersede a player without prompting from rules and with obs 8 votes to draw. without obs, this rule would be stupid. @matdas

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: Unhost Rule discussion

Postby aRt)Y » Sat Mar 21, 2015 7:19 pm

Note, poll runs till March 23rd.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: Unhost Rule discussion

Postby aRt)Y » Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:27 pm

50%,50% legit
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition


Return to “LIHL Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests