Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 339388.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #90
Your Warcraft III Username: AssOpener@useast
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Doggy_Style@useast
Violated Rule(s): Maphack
Time of Violation (in-game or replay)/b]: 12:40, 24:00
[b]Any further thoughts: I have played numerous games with this player, both on his team and opposing, and have always suspected he maphacks. I've been fed up so I finally watched the replay and caught him twice. On the first instance @ around 12:40 you can see him mirror my movements as I have an invis rune. He then dodges my arrow with unrealistic reflexes as he is making evasive maneuvers the entire time and shouldnt have any idea I am there. The second instance at around 24:00 is strikingly similar. No vision and he dodges an arrow he couldnt have seen coming. I don't know how to catch fog clicks or what not, but I'm sure someone more skilled than myself can take a look and confirm this. Thanks in advance.
[DOTA] Doggy_Style@useast.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
- HazarDous
- Staff Department
- Posts: 9051
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:36 pm
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 227 times
Re: [DOTA] Doggy_Style@useast.battle.net
After reviewing:
12:40: He went for both runes, never mirrored your movements. He dodged your arrow because when you cast a spell, invis goes off. He just had a decent reaction time.
16:10 He just seems to have no idea where purple is.
21? and 24:26, he uses invis ward on enemy hills and then kills the enemy wards. Slightly suspicious considering those are normal ward spots.
I think you mean 24:43? Nothing suspicious there at all..
Overall, not enough evidence of MH
Denied.
12:40: He went for both runes, never mirrored your movements. He dodged your arrow because when you cast a spell, invis goes off. He just had a decent reaction time.
16:10 He just seems to have no idea where purple is.
21? and 24:26, he uses invis ward on enemy hills and then kills the enemy wards. Slightly suspicious considering those are normal ward spots.
I think you mean 24:43? Nothing suspicious there at all..
Overall, not enough evidence of MH
Denied.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests