[b]Replay Link[https://entgaming.net/openstats/dota/game/6348265/]:
[b]Game Name[[ENT] DotA apem euro #28]:
[b]Your Warcraft III Username[isjagut]:
[b]Violator's Warcraft III Username[tyurgg]:
[b]Violated Rule(s)[flamer and maphacking]:
[b]Time of Violation (
01:33-01:38 he cant see the bombs, why he not cut??
02:05 LC and me attack him, i try to brimg him in the bombs, but he never follow me , and normaly its easy to kill me in this place, show it and u will see it by urself
04:11 again he NOT follow LC in the bombs, again no ward there!]:
04:17 he see lc´s way in FOG!! and attack into the woods?!after the attack he again NOT follow to kill low LC, WHY?
05:02 he go EXACTY to techie in the same sec , techie put bombs, how he see him??
05:11 he AGAIN ot follow low Techie in bombs, he cant see the bombs, why he back??
theres a lot of moments to prove he have MH!!!
everybody in my team see it
[b]Any further thoughts[he NOT attack techie and NO cut, because he see the bombs!?no ward top!techie put bombs BEFOR axe was there!]:
[DOTA] tyurgg ban for maphacking please
Moderator: ENT Staff
Re: [DOTA] tyurgg ban for maphacking please
05:59 again he go back after he SEE the bombs with his MH
- HazarDous
- Staff Department
- Posts: 9051
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:36 pm
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 227 times
Re: [DOTA] tyurgg ban for maphacking please
1:33: Creeps weren't even spawned yet, you can't expect him to ''cut''.
2:05: Hard to accuse someone of MH on something he did NOT do.. he didn't even come close to the bomb
4:11: This timestamp makes more sense, he didn't follow LC there, but instead continued and took another path.
To resume, this is really just a big hide and seek game between Axe/LC/Techi/Bombs. However, isn't a good player going to expect bombs on obvious spots against a techie?
9:35: Seems to know LC is in the woods, kinda chases him but finally goes to creeps.
10:00: Walks into 2 bombs while chasing LC
15:40: Runs into LC, doesn't seem to know he's there since he ran away when he saw him.
I'm gonna have to deny your request for lack of proofs. Feel free to post another request if you discover new incriminatory timestamps.
2:05: Hard to accuse someone of MH on something he did NOT do.. he didn't even come close to the bomb
4:11: This timestamp makes more sense, he didn't follow LC there, but instead continued and took another path.
To resume, this is really just a big hide and seek game between Axe/LC/Techi/Bombs. However, isn't a good player going to expect bombs on obvious spots against a techie?
9:35: Seems to know LC is in the woods, kinda chases him but finally goes to creeps.
10:00: Walks into 2 bombs while chasing LC
15:40: Runs into LC, doesn't seem to know he's there since he ran away when he saw him.
I'm gonna have to deny your request for lack of proofs. Feel free to post another request if you discover new incriminatory timestamps.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests