Not healing d king when no more heals r needed on same round should not be bannable.
If u dissagre I will ban request all players using autoheals, including LIHL, cause I was just banned for that by king69.
Plz be specific about not healing d king rule and consider modifing.
[LTD] NOT HEALIN KING & BAN RULES
Moderator: Oversight Staff
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
- nabo.
- Donator
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
- Location: Dokdo, KOREA
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: [LTD] NOT HEALIN KING & BAN RULES
Crazy_Skeleton wrote:Not healing d king when no more heals r needed on same round should not be bannable.
We dont ban for such cases, but has to be obvious, not ambiguous or uncertain or close.
If u dissagre I will ban request all players using autoheals, including LIHL, cause I was just banned for that by king69.
Dont be childish.
@king23 can you recheck if game woulda ended heal or not? Was it the last heal needed?
Plz be specific about not healing d king rule and consider modifing.
May be.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: [LTD] NOT HEALIN KING & BAN RULES
"If u dissagre I will ban request all players using autoheals, including LIHL, cause I was just banned for that by king69.
Dont be childish."
It is not childish, it is mature and having responsibility of ur decisions. Rules must be same for all.
Still d meaning of this post is same. I suggest to be more precise abot not healing d king rule.
"U may not heal d king and use autoheal option if no more heals will be used same round." In very specific situations we have game ruiner rule.
@nabo.
Dont be childish."
It is not childish, it is mature and having responsibility of ur decisions. Rules must be same for all.
Still d meaning of this post is same. I suggest to be more precise abot not healing d king rule.
"U may not heal d king and use autoheal option if no more heals will be used same round." In very specific situations we have game ruiner rule.
@nabo.
- nabo.
- Donator
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
- Location: Dokdo, KOREA
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: [LTD] NOT HEALIN KING & BAN RULES
Rules dont always need to be specific. Use your common sense.
There are different cases of mishealing situations.
Yes, your comment that you will report all players who end up autohealing is childish. Ive seen you act like an idiot on forum, so lets not start.
If King made a mistake, he will correct it. Seems you got unbanned: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=70488
I'll watch the replay later and see if it should be mentioned or whether it was mod's wrong judgement.
As for lihl: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=72&t=69408
There are different cases of mishealing situations.
Yes, your comment that you will report all players who end up autohealing is childish. Ive seen you act like an idiot on forum, so lets not start.
If King made a mistake, he will correct it. Seems you got unbanned: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=70488
I'll watch the replay later and see if it should be mentioned or whether it was mod's wrong judgement.
As for lihl: https://entgaming.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=72&t=69408
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: [LTD] NOT HEALIN KING & BAN RULES
I wanted to make a suggestion to people responsibile for making the rules, not to get a judgement from a single person. But if u r responible for d rules alone, I accept ur response.
- KinG23
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:03 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: [LTD] NOT HEALIN KING & BAN RULES
Spoke with on Bnet. I think everything is clear to Crazy_Skeleton regarding the current rules now. If not, just PM me here or whisper me in Bnet.
*kisses*
- KinG23
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:03 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: [LTD] NOT HEALIN KING & BAN RULES
@nabo.
The missed heal was on level 6, then the game was lost on level 7. As a result of this, the King was only at 75% of hit points by the time the creeps at wave 7 spawned and hit the king. The ban was definitely justified here to be more aware in the future about healing the king, especially when being asked to do so by the teammate, and having a clear healing order established, but still not healing. It was very evident that the heal was needed on level 6.
The missed heal was on level 6, then the game was lost on level 7. As a result of this, the King was only at 75% of hit points by the time the creeps at wave 7 spawned and hit the king. The ban was definitely justified here to be more aware in the future about healing the king, especially when being asked to do so by the teammate, and having a clear healing order established, but still not healing. It was very evident that the heal was needed on level 6.
*kisses*
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3484
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:26 pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 39 times
Re: [LTD] NOT HEALIN KING & BAN RULES
I agree with this suggestion. Seems very pedantic ban for 2 days for a mistake in a game. No longer does this ruin the game so the ban is completely unnecessary.
Everyone makes mistakes in games, that's why people are all different elos.
Everyone makes mistakes in games, that's why people are all different elos.
- nabo.
- Donator
- Posts: 11892
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:30 am
- Location: Dokdo, KOREA
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 158 times
Re: [LTD] NOT HEALIN KING & BAN RULES
@crazy_skeleton
You purposely did not heal lvl 6 because you either did not want to or thought youd lose lvl 7 anyway. However, game was not gonna end lvl 6 definitely.
Yes, you should have healed. Does not look like a mistake. If no send and you guys had few more king ups, could have lived lvl 7 maybe. Prob, a day ban was sufficient though.
(11:50 / Allied) Crazy_Skeleton: we need king LOL
(11:57 / Allied) undeadkingpr: ill stomp 1-2
(12:23 / Allied) undeadkingpr: your heal
(12:31 / Allied) undeadkingpr: cmon man..
(12:35 / Allied) Crazy_Skeleton: cmon what
(12:39 / Allied) undeadkingpr: you shoulda healed.
You definitely knew a heal was probably going to be needed. In general, all should heal when they are suppose to.
It seems unlike what I meant on lihl, you mean that since King was not gonna die even if no heal and no more heals would be needed, the autoheal (heal half of king's hp) was enough to survive. But, in this case, it is not that the autoheal healed the king to full hp nor did you guys have enough regen on king to heal up by lvl 7 leaks. So, you should have healed so king heals 10k HP.
You purposely did not heal lvl 6 because you either did not want to or thought youd lose lvl 7 anyway. However, game was not gonna end lvl 6 definitely.
Yes, you should have healed. Does not look like a mistake. If no send and you guys had few more king ups, could have lived lvl 7 maybe. Prob, a day ban was sufficient though.
(11:50 / Allied) Crazy_Skeleton: we need king LOL
(11:57 / Allied) undeadkingpr: ill stomp 1-2
(12:23 / Allied) undeadkingpr: your heal
(12:31 / Allied) undeadkingpr: cmon man..
(12:35 / Allied) Crazy_Skeleton: cmon what
(12:39 / Allied) undeadkingpr: you shoulda healed.
You definitely knew a heal was probably going to be needed. In general, all should heal when they are suppose to.
crazy_skeleton wrote:Not healing d king when no more heals r needed on same round should not be bannable.
It seems unlike what I meant on lihl, you mean that since King was not gonna die even if no heal and no more heals would be needed, the autoheal (heal half of king's hp) was enough to survive. But, in this case, it is not that the autoheal healed the king to full hp nor did you guys have enough regen on king to heal up by lvl 7 leaks. So, you should have healed so king heals 10k HP.
Return to “Suggestion Archive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 94 guests