Guennter wrote:MickeyTheMousie wrote:At Guennter and supersexyy
First of all, what Guennter is saying is just nonsense. A players with 52% can play 1000 games and have 520-480 stats = 40 score. Someone with 70% will have this already after 100 games. The winner of the season will be BOTH a very good player and active which seems to be a good set of qualities for the winner of a season.
Well, sry but this wouldnt happen.
Considering only players with 200+ games, we actually have beep with 58%wins and ilocos + fiji with around 55%wins, all others are below this.
Since this winpercentages are so close, a higher amount of games would have BIG influence on the score.
So if a 54% winning player plays 1000games, then (just an example) beep would have to play minimum 500games to equal his score.
But your mistake lies in that the current system 'aims' toward 50% with balance. Those % will never happen with randomizing.