Suggestion

[Thandrin]

So I thought it would be a cool idea to implement something i'll just call *King Priority Mode*-
It would work something like this-
Each player’s harvested lumber goes into a pool that can be utilized by a selected player.
Sends would be made more even such as 800 lumber redeemed for 4 blood orcs/ 560 for 4 furbolgs/6000 for 4 demons. Though Income will still be set to how much a single player contributed at the time of use. Leftover lumber can still be used such as adding a hermit on top of an even send.
This player will also have control over king upgrades if he is king or not. This would be advantageous to avoid over upping.
This might be too much work for such an old game (maybe a legion 2 mode) I can think of issues that would arise like early income for individual builds and so on, but I’ll let a good programmer figure out a solution if they want to undertake this endeavour.
Really just an idea that could solve the hindrance of uneven sends that so often can flip a particular game upside down. That and solo sends. Screw those guys.
Over to you lads, flame on.

[RadiantCrystal]

Too many options makes me not wanting to read the whole thing ^^

[supersexyy]

So basically one player has a huge control over the game. Sounds like a pub nightmare. Furthermore this suggestion doesn't change the uneven distribution of sends received.

Also a terrible suggestion in general.

[Thandrin]

Sorry you think that,
If sends are made in groups of 4 like the suggestion makes, this would indeed make the distribution of sends more even due to having 4 of a specific send being made. Any single send could be made after lumber costs of higher value sends are exhausted which could make the devising algorithm already implemented perform more accurately.
As an optional mode, I don't see pub games being a nightmare unless opted for to make a more accurate game. Something I could see being more beneficial in competitive games.
A team comes to some sort of agreement when sends are made and a team sends together (most of the time) anyway so I don't see this as being an abuse of power.
But these are valid concerns, thanks for commenting.
I had hoped the poll to be more open to what people were thinking in a broader sense. I'd rather detailed comments and suggestions, so a poll with 2 options should this be implemented or not was a bit black and white.

[Play4EIo]

1 more vote option needs to be there:

Hell no [1]

^^

[reena]

i love solo sending!!

[SLSGuennter]

In LTD2 there already is an algorythm which will make the sends more even.
Atm there are 2 different ways of how it could be done, and asfaik Lisk didnt decide yet, which one to take. It will DEFINETLY not be this one ^^

[nabo.]

Bad poll.

I thought brouder's send system was at least an improvement of what we have?

Closing topic since I dont see the usefulness.