Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 287810.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #29
Your Warcraft III Username: 789
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Grape
Violated Rule(s): MapHack
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 30min in replay
Any further thoughts: Void charges Rosh as meepo was about to finish and grabs aegis with no wards and limited information to go off of. It is possible that there isn't a maphack involved. But with the timing and no wards/vision what so ever, scourge played defensive all game, it was a strange time to get super aggressive with perfect timing.
[DOTA] Maphack Grape@uswest.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 154 times
Re: [DOTA] Maphack Grape@uswest.battle.net
He had vision of all 4 of your teamates fighting at the edge of middle lane in forest next to scourge base. Meepo is not visible anywhere, not in lane. It was a prudent suspicion in my opinion. I do not know this player personally but I know of him, and have played a number of games with him and against him over the years. He is an excellent player. Meepo bounces from one lane to another all game. Where else would he be when suddenly he is not seen for a while? Not necessarily rosh, but certainly worthy of checking. It wasnt really super aggressive as you termed it since he knew where the other 4 sentinel heroes were. But yes it was good timing. Not enough evidence to prove maphack.
Denied
Denied
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests