BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@useast
Moderator: ENT Staff
- BeepBoopBeep
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3256
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:23 pm
- Location: Australia!
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@useast
Your Warcraft III username: BeepBoopBeep@useast.battle.net
Violator's Warcraft III username: dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net - wodota.loh@useast.battle.net
Game name or map name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #13
Approximate date/time of game (alternatively, link to a Stats page): http://clanent.net/findstats.php?id=1247937
Rule player violated: Maphack
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): Please note @ wave 7, dungeonseeker & wodota.loh admit to having Maphack in game chat to there allies. More evidence dungeonseeker knows pink swaped to merc, calls out how many wisps they have and when they are sending. All the evidence you need is here; http://s1.clanent.net/replay/view_repla ... 247937.w3g
Any further thoughts: P.S i was not in this game, i saw this post; viewtopic.php?f=64&t=7001
As a friend of sentinels i was curious and stumbled upon this ^^
Also i believe red should be punished for failing to report this. And encouraged dungeonseeker, to keep Maphack on to his advantage.
Violator's Warcraft III username: dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net - wodota.loh@useast.battle.net
Game name or map name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #13
Approximate date/time of game (alternatively, link to a Stats page): http://clanent.net/findstats.php?id=1247937
Rule player violated: Maphack
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): Please note @ wave 7, dungeonseeker & wodota.loh admit to having Maphack in game chat to there allies. More evidence dungeonseeker knows pink swaped to merc, calls out how many wisps they have and when they are sending. All the evidence you need is here; http://s1.clanent.net/replay/view_repla ... 247937.w3g
Any further thoughts: P.S i was not in this game, i saw this post; viewtopic.php?f=64&t=7001
As a friend of sentinels i was curious and stumbled upon this ^^
Also i believe red should be punished for failing to report this. And encouraged dungeonseeker, to keep Maphack on to his advantage.
- Attachments
-
- dungeonseeker&wodota.loh.w3g
- (3.29 MiB) Downloaded 94 times
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:15 pm
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
!support
everybody knows dungeonseeker is a maphacker.
red shouldn´t be banned for playing with maphacker/for not BanRequest
everybody knows dungeonseeker is a maphacker.
red shouldn´t be banned for playing with maphacker/for not BanRequest
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
!Support For both Dungeonseeker and twerk.
[spoiler=](13:49 / Allied) dungeonseeker: faggot pink
(13:55 / Allied) dungeonseeker: i turned on mh just to see
(13:58 / Allied) dungeonseeker: and he's merc..
(14:01 / Allied) dungeonseeker: in a 4v3 wow[/spoiler]
[spoiler=](15:27 / Allied) TWERK](15:27 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: since this whore
(15:29 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: mercing us
(15:31 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: keep mh on
(15:32 / Allied) myaxe: '
(15:33 / Allied) myaxe: yeah
(15:33 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: so u can see
(15:34 / Allied) dungeonseeker: yea
(15:35 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: when he weak
(15:36 / Allied) myaxe: they got 1 more heal left
(15:39 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: we still win[/spoiler]
Throughout the game, dungeonseeker gives details of the oppositions sends and builds. Obviously maphacking. Destruction of his stats and a long ban is deserved imho.
Twerk, implores on dungeon to keep using mh, which in my opinion deserves a significant ban aswell.
[spoiler=](13:49 / Allied) dungeonseeker: faggot pink
(13:55 / Allied) dungeonseeker: i turned on mh just to see
(13:58 / Allied) dungeonseeker: and he's merc..
(14:01 / Allied) dungeonseeker: in a 4v3 wow[/spoiler]
[spoiler=](15:27 / Allied) TWERK](15:27 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: since this whore
(15:29 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: mercing us
(15:31 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: keep mh on
(15:32 / Allied) myaxe: '
(15:33 / Allied) myaxe: yeah
(15:33 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: so u can see
(15:34 / Allied) dungeonseeker: yea
(15:35 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: when he weak
(15:36 / Allied) myaxe: they got 1 more heal left
(15:39 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: we still win[/spoiler]
Throughout the game, dungeonseeker gives details of the oppositions sends and builds. Obviously maphacking. Destruction of his stats and a long ban is deserved imho.
Twerk, implores on dungeon to keep using mh, which in my opinion deserves a significant ban aswell.
- BeepBoopBeep
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3256
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:23 pm
- Location: Australia!
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
Thanks for the support,
The reason i asked for red to be punished is because he had the time to make this post, viewtopic.php?f=64&t=7001
But not submit a ban request for the #2 highest elo player, who uses Maphack, that by it's self is a disgrace.
The reason i asked for red to be punished is because he had the time to make this post, viewtopic.php?f=64&t=7001
But not submit a ban request for the #2 highest elo player, who uses Maphack, that by it's self is a disgrace.
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
lol, epic. turned on MH cuz some1 merced
He wanted and did ghosting. It's equal to maphacking, if i'm not wrong.
I'd call this ghosting for sure
BeepBoopBeep wrote:Also i believe red should be punished for failing to report this. And encouraged dungeonseeker, to keep Maphack on to his advantage.
Code: Select all
(15:27 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: since this whore
(15:29 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: mercing us
(15:31 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: keep mh on
(15:33 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: so u can see
(15:34 / Allied) dungeonseeker: yea
(15:35 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: when he weak
He wanted and did ghosting. It's equal to maphacking, if i'm not wrong.
Code: Select all
(51:58 / Allied) dungeonseeker: they're sending this round btw
(52:03 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: very sick send ?
(52:20 / Allied) TWERK]TEAM1: but im gonna be 2 k overvalue
I'd call this ghosting for sure
- BeepBoopBeep
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3256
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:23 pm
- Location: Australia!
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
I looked at the replay in full, i can see why red never reported this, now i believe the whole WEST team should be banned. Blue whatever maphack he was using allowed him to send gold directly to red allowing him to be HEAVILY overvalue every level, this i believe must come under a major abuse.
But i will let a higher power decide there fate.
Also thanks for your support bit Much appreciated from all.
But i will let a higher power decide there fate.
Also thanks for your support bit Much appreciated from all.
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:15 pm
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
a little advice for you. don´t play vs. dungeonseeker and other well known players. -> they not get so much elo points for a win.
you could try lvl1 8 Warriors for big leak. ^^
you could try lvl1 8 Warriors for big leak. ^^
- HealByColor
- Donator
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:56 pm
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
!support so many ppl ruin the game why would twerk say keep it on
[spoiler=] [/spoiler]
[spoiler=] [/spoiler]
-Ghosting for sure bit also wodota.loh admitted to a maphack these so called top players give us a bad name
[spoiler=] [/spoiler]
[spoiler=] [/spoiler]
-Ghosting for sure bit also wodota.loh admitted to a maphack these so called top players give us a bad name
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
blah mh is wrong, and i dont support it, but i had so much anger towards our enemies of obvious resons,they merced us, when saying nO merc.. so i told him keep it on... god dont ban me for this, im clean player..
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
BeepBoopBeep wrote:I looked at the replay in full, i can see why red never reported this, now i believe the whole WEST team should be banned. Blue whatever maphack he was using allowed him to send gold directly to red allowing him to be HEAVILY overvalue every level, this i believe must come under a major abuse.
But i will let a higher power decide there fate.
Also thanks for your support bit Much appreciated from all.
TY........................................
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
wTc[Aunt.Tan] wrote:!support
everybody knows dungeonseeker is a maphacker.
red shouldn´t be banned for playing with maphacker/for not BanRequest
ty..
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
TWERK-TEAM1 wrote:blah mh is wrong, and i dont support it, but i had so much anger towards our enemies of obvious resons,they merced us, when saying nO merc.. so i told him keep it on... god dont ban me for this, im clean player..
This post, just proves he really doesn't understand he is at fault - showing disdain for someone trying to cheat at a game, EVEN encouraging that person to cheat, just because he doesnt like the opposition. That is like defending murder, because the person you killed annoyed you. IT just is not an acceptable defence.
The moment MH was announced he should have demanded it would be switched off, and reported the MH users. To not do so is showing support for cheating/hacking, and is almost as bad as having the hack as well. Perhaps, full ban for the users and half of a MH time ban for supporting it.
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:17 pm
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
i am the biggest hater of maphackers, being that i just stopped playing footmen frenzy cuz of the abundance of maphackers there, dungeon is a known mher for a long time, while all he does his merc merc merc, dodge dodge and dodge some more. on the other hand, since they made a no merc agreement, and the other team just ignored it, i understand twerk's rage, and i dont think he should be banned since he didnt cheat in any way, and even respected the no merc agreement. and to conclude, get dungeon out of this game.
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
bugatti_veyron wrote:i am the biggest hater of maphackers, being that i just stopped playing footmen frenzy cuz of the abundance of maphackers there, dungeon is a known mher for a long time, while all he does his merc merc merc, dodge dodge and dodge some more. on the other hand, since they made a no merc agreement, and the other team just ignored it, i understand twerk's rage, and i dont think he should be banned since he didnt cheat in any way, and even respected the no merc agreement. and to conclude, get dungeon out of this game.
ty..
Re: BanRequest:dungeonseeker@useast.battle.net/wodota.loh@us
bugatti_veyron wrote:i am the biggest hater of maphackers, being that i just stopped playing footmen frenzy cuz of the abundance of maphackers there, dungeon is a known mher for a long time, while all he does his merc merc merc, dodge dodge and dodge some more. on the other hand, since they made a no merc agreement, and the other team just ignored it, i understand twerk's rage, and i dont think he should be banned since he didnt cheat in any way, and even respected the no merc agreement. and to conclude, get dungeon out of this game.
it's fine that you're trying to blanch over your friend in every thread, but it has nothing to do with mercing. mercing is a known issue in Mega version, but u can't break any rules because of it. if u know how to get rid of it - feel free to use the suggestion sub-forum.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests