Replay Link: 7397872.w3g http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 397872.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA apem us/ca #83
Your Warcraft III Username: relentl3ss @uswest.battle.net
Violator's Warcraft III Username: pluto @uswest.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): Did not votekick feeder and gave him four chances to votekick. He even say !no.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 17:45, 23:26, 30:32, 36:49, 37:22
Any further thoughts: At 37:22 he types !no for the votekick. Our dg omni feed like 0-14 and the snipe didn't votekick. Please ban him, thank you very much
[DOTA] pluto @uswest.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
- relentl3ss
- Aura Tree
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 9:21 pm
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
-
- Donator
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2015 1:03 am
- Location: Montreal
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: [DOTA] pluto @uswest.battle.net
Ive watched 1:00-25:00
pakarranko is definatly not a good player.
Wich is not a valid reason to kick him.
He does die alot but nothing intentionnal.
12:00 pakarranko push top lane gets tower
20:00 tp bot to def t3
Use his skills repel/heal for good reasons
Should be denied.
pakarranko is definatly not a good player.
Wich is not a valid reason to kick him.
He does die alot but nothing intentionnal.
12:00 pakarranko push top lane gets tower
20:00 tp bot to def t3
Use his skills repel/heal for good reasons
Should be denied.
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 154 times
Re: [DOTA] pluto @uswest.battle.net
I watched the whole game and I agree with Tatl. We are a noob friendly server. He obviously was fairly new, his stats confirm this. Refer to our wiki for when it is appropriate to votekick a new player. In this case it was not.
Denied.
Denied.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests