stating the rules for dota

Suggestions will be moved here once processed.

Moderator: Oversight Staff

PwnLikeMe
Aura Tree
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:24 am

stating the rules for dota

Postby PwnLikeMe » Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:38 am

When starting a game please make the bot saying that any mine destroyed with chicken is considered bannable offence, because currently that is not clear in any way and it is a valid bannable offence that everybody should be aware of. This will make it easy to avoid thousands of bans.

child
Plague Treant
Posts: 1525
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 9:35 pm
Location: Motherland
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 26 times

Re: stating the rules for dota

Postby child » Thu Mar 24, 2016 9:31 am

agreed, and the LOD bot should have an announcement about kraken shell.

Hatedmaru

Re: stating the rules for dota

Postby Hatedmaru » Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:12 am

Both kraken shell & courier usage on mines are bannable, since they end up being a glitch/exploit of the map (and therefore bannable under General Rules).

Currently there's an announcement on both DotA/LoD bots "Important rule updates regarding courier and kraken shell usage! wiki.entgaming.net" + It was also announced on the wiki news (and other media) - So we've used every channel to inform of the changes made, however it is also a user's responsability to check the forum/wiki for rules update, etc

Considering both situations (Kraken Shell/Courier usage on mines) are bannable as glitch/exploit of the map (which falls under the current general rules), i don't really see a reason to specify it

User avatar
aRt)Y
Protector of Nature
Posts: 13142
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 174 times
Contact:

Re: stating the rules for dota

Postby aRt)Y » Thu Mar 24, 2016 11:22 am

Besides, bot announcements dont work reliably and game start announcements are just spam and a technical effort we can't consider in our situation.

There's a forum group and mainly the wiki to inform yourselves.
    Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
      Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition


Return to “Suggestion Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests