New ranking system to stay or?

Moderator: LIHL Staff

User avatar
Dong
Donator
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 8:16 pm
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: New ranking system to stay or?

Postby Dong » Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:08 pm

i am a big fan of the randomized teams, i just agree with most i think, when i say, that the elo need to reflect the "scores" just a bit more :)
Thou shall self tk.

User avatar
dweiler
Plague Treant
Posts: 1735
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:28 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 232 times

Re: New ranking system to stay or?

Postby dweiler » Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:23 pm

supersexyy wrote:If you're saying low players are protected by the old system through getting larger elo gains, you adjust the scaling to be more reflective of the game.


I think if we want to reflect Elo in randomized teams we should either do this, or make a max Elo gain/loss like +23/-7. I think games like -27/+3 in LTD with only 'good players' never reflect the winning chances. Rolls and king skill have a too great factor too have such big differences. Probably around +23/-7 (which would be about 70/30%) is the max. (Tinsoldier with huge Elo at the moment is at 61%)
You don't stop playing because you grow old; you grow old because you stop playing.


Return to “LIHL Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests