AUTOBAN suggestion
Moderator: Oversight Staff
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
AUTOBAN suggestion
Since many pple, including myself can not enjoy working gproxy, I strongly suggest to make autoban duration to the earlier length. Untill plyrs will be able to have working gproxy.
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: AUTOBAN suggestion
It is unlikely that gproxy will be fixed any time soon. Reducing the ban duration doesn't really do much as you will have to appeal anyway.
So I assume your suggestion is merely about saving the time for posting an appeal?
So I assume your suggestion is merely about saving the time for posting an appeal?
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: AUTOBAN suggestion
Well, I am just saying that if an appeal will not be approved, 2 days is just sometimes not fair. I find 2 days unfair since u can not have gproxy, unless u rq ofc.
Just wanted to pointed this out. If we had gproxy, I am 200% for giving 2days autoban!
Just wanted to pointed this out. If we had gproxy, I am 200% for giving 2days autoban!
- KinG23
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:03 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: AUTOBAN suggestion
Crazy_Skeleton wrote:Well, I am just saying that if an appeal will not be approved, 2 days is just sometimes not fair. I find 2 days unfair since u can not have gproxy, unless u rq ofc.
Just wanted to pointed this out. If we had gproxy, I am 200% for giving 2days autoban!
We do have a functional GProxy. It's the Varlock version.
http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... oxyVarlock
Since your whole suggestion is based on the merit of not having GProxy, I think we can consider that moot now that you see a working version.
*kisses*
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: AUTOBAN suggestion
Hey Oldsport!
Well I can not make it work for me, it writes i have a bad version of WC3; and I am not the only stupid one ..
Well I can not make it work for me, it writes i have a bad version of WC3; and I am not the only stupid one ..
- KinG23
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 5:03 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: AUTOBAN suggestion
Hey! Tell us the exact errors you are receiving. It can be as simple as downloading some files (free) from the official Microsoft website, and/or reinstalling WC3.
@Crazy_Skeleton
@Crazy_Skeleton
- These users thanked the author KinG23 for the post:
- Crazy_Skeleton (Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:17 pm)
*kisses*
- HazarDous
- Staff Department
- Posts: 9051
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 9:36 pm
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 227 times
Re: AUTOBAN suggestion
@Crazy_Skeleton
Go to your Varlock Gproxy.cfg file and change your ''war3version'' to 27.
Go to your Varlock Gproxy.cfg file and change your ''war3version'' to 27.
Code: Select all
war3version = 27
- These users thanked the author HazarDous for the post:
- Crazy_Skeleton (Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:17 pm)
- aRt)Y
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 13142
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 9:15 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 174 times
- Contact:
Re: AUTOBAN suggestion
Denied.
- Information, Rules, Guides and everything else you need to know about ENT is on the ENT Wiki.
- Ignorantia juris non excusat • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? • Fallacy of composition
Return to “Suggestion Archive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 173 guests