[DOTA] Maphacker 312_pizduk@asia.battle.net

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

Xanatos-iX
Resource Storage
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 6:43 pm
Has thanked: 1 time

[DOTA] Maphacker 312_pizduk@asia.battle.net

Postby Xanatos-iX » Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:55 am

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 893097.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #62
Your Warcraft III Username: Xanatos-iX@useast.battle.net
Violator's Warcraft III Username: 312_pizduk@asia.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): Maphack
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 11:43
Any further thoughts: At around 11:35 or so I use windwalk to go behind the trees on the side of the middle tower. With no vision or any other reason to go there, pizduk walks behind the trees and reveals me to his team. So glad to finally have caught this maphacker red handed.
Last edited by broud3r on Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: fixed format

User avatar
broud3r
ENT Staff
Posts: 1502
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 11:00 am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 119 times

Re: [DOTA] Maphacker 312_pizduk@asia.battle.net

Postby broud3r » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:23 am

@Xanatos-iX are there more indicators? one instant of inordinately behavior is often not enough to prove a maphack.
If so please provide them with timestamps.

Xanatos-iX
Resource Storage
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 6:43 pm
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: [DOTA] Maphacker 312_pizduk@asia.battle.net

Postby Xanatos-iX » Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:49 am

I would have to play him again, maphackers dont usually blunder like this multiple times in a single game. Otherwise they risk getting banned.

Hatedmaru

Re: [DOTA] Maphacker 312_pizduk@asia.battle.net

Postby Hatedmaru » Sat Jun 18, 2016 6:42 am

The situation you mention, he was backing out since your team was pushing mid, and the moment he enters that forest near the tower (which is not an uncommon move), you come into sight, so silencer backs and everyone noticed your location - So honestly if this is the only timestamp you have, this is not suspicious at all.

(From the start till the mentioned timestamp, dind't notice anything uncommon either)

BeerLord
Protector of Nature
Posts: 6658
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 154 times

Re: [DOTA] Maphacker 312_pizduk@asia.battle.net

Postby BeerLord » Sat Jun 18, 2016 6:15 pm

Evidence insufficient.
Denied.


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests