Some bitching about ELO

Talk all you want about Island Defense here.
pep
Forest Walker
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 6:21 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby pep » Sun Jul 24, 2016 7:29 pm

burn showoff gg, I remember capping at 1400 few version ago.
"hot gamer grills are a myth, bout as likely to find a unicorn" - hash

Stealer
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3160
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:37 pm
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby Stealer » Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:05 am

So having 200 more elo than the other team is basically 75% win chance so seems logical.


http://www.bobnewell.net/nucleus/bnewell.php?itemid=279
( plug in whatever elo you get curious about )

Burn
Protector of Nature
Posts: 2588
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 6:29 am
Location: Clan BTI @ East
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 54 times
Contact:

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby Burn » Tue Jul 26, 2016 3:44 am

Do we use the same elo system though?

-Burn

Stealer
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3160
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:37 pm
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby Stealer » Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:52 pm

Uh yes?

Do you even elo?


Elo is a specific rating system.

supersexyy
Donator
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:26 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby supersexyy » Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:20 am

Stealer wrote:Uh yes?

Do you even elo?


Elo is a specific rating system.


That doesn't mean that the numbers used in ID are the same. For example, I took the last game of ID: https://entgaming.net/customstats/islan ... e/8105896/

Loser lost -13.9 and winners gained +2.78. Obviously not reflective of the chess elo rating system.
Last edited by supersexyy on Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

supersexyy
Donator
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:26 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby supersexyy » Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:20 am

delete
Image

Burn
Protector of Nature
Posts: 2588
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 6:29 am
Location: Clan BTI @ East
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 54 times
Contact:

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby Burn » Wed Jul 27, 2016 12:35 am

Exactly what I'm trying to say. Our elo equation is modified. Therefore, Stealer's link isn't accurate.
Do you even elo?
I also play chess, so I Elo very much.

-Burn

Stealer
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3160
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:37 pm
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby Stealer » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:17 am

supersexyy wrote:That doesn't mean that the numbers used in ID are the same. For example, I took the last game of ID: https://entgaming.net/customstats/islan ... e/8105896/

Loser lost -13.9 and winners gained +2.78. Obviously not reflective of the chess elo rating system.


And? Different K values will result in different gains.

Burn wrote:I also play chess, so I Elo very much.


uakf stole the formula from chess hence his chess relate comments...


ELO script wrote:/* FIXME: this is the chess distribution; games should be
able to set their own. */
if (player_ratings[i] < 2000)
K = 30.0;
else if (player_ratings[i] > 2400)
K = 10.0;
else
K = 130.0 - player_ratings[i] / 20.0;


tbh arguing with you people is useless since you probably can't even do "complex" math anymore nor do you try to actually look up any of these formulas to show them as different.

supersexyy
Donator
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:26 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby supersexyy » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:31 am

Taking the example of the game I linked:

Your rating: 1023 (average of builders) Opponent's rating: 981

Probability of winning: 0.560150145231903

So there should be a 44:56 elo gain/elo loss ratio

The ratio was actually 13.9 : 2.78 which is an expected 83% win ratio.

To get that expected win ratio you'd be looking at approximately 1250 elo builders vs 981 Titan elo.

@Stealer Happy for you to show me exactly what formula is used in ID and how it is reflective of the win% chances of the elo formula.

tbh arguing with you people is useless since you probably can't even do "complex" math anymore nor do you try to actually look up any of these formulas to show them as different.

An ad hominem response doesn't make your argument any more valid.
Last edited by supersexyy on Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

supersexyy
Donator
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:26 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby supersexyy » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:39 am

delete
Image

Stealer
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3160
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:37 pm
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby Stealer » Thu Jul 28, 2016 1:16 am

supersexyy wrote:So there should be a 44:56 elo gain/elo loss ratio

no.

supersexyy wrote:An ad hominem response doesn't make your argument any more valid.

Sure but I have no interest in argueing with people who can't keep up with the math.

supersexyy
Donator
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:26 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby supersexyy » Thu Jul 28, 2016 1:46 am

Correct me then, instead of being a dick about it.
Image

Burn
Protector of Nature
Posts: 2588
Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 6:29 am
Location: Clan BTI @ East
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 54 times
Contact:

Re: Some bitching about ELO

Postby Burn » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:32 am

Chess elo calculations and ID calculations are CLEARLY different. You don't even need to check the elo equation if you pay attention to both chess and ID elo gains and losses.

At this point your ad hominem arguments are making you come off as a troll, so you're right, there's no point arguing.

-Burn


Return to “Island Defense”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests