Replay Link: http://wiki.entgaming.net/index.php?tit ... ng:VKRules
Game Name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #46
Your Warcraft III Username: doteropronoob
Violator's Warcraft III Username: kiiwa
Violated Rule(s): votekick abuse(If a votekick is initiated to kick a visible game ruiner, all players are obligated to !yes. ), (You are obligated to !votekick any player that has broken any of ENT's rules.), afker griefer (Do not go away from keyboard for an excessive amount of time, especially without telling other players beforehand, and/or refuse to play the game in an attempt to ruin it. Neither are you allowed to grief by resetting the afk timer.)
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): afk start at minute 22. you can check him he is in base not moving after 5 minutes he decides to patrol with his unit at 27:29ms, after i called the !votekick command he starts using his hero so he doesnt get kicked, you can see he goes 2 times to woods kill 1 group of creeps goes base. he is not playing with team most of the time he just go woods to kill 1 group of creeps and go fountin, he afker griefed when enemy team was attacking towers so i asked to votekick because is a entrule breaking to afk and grief, you can also check there is a 13 minute time between his lvl 11 and his lvl 12. he was not playing during that time.
Any further thoughts: slark did stay afk and griefed, in the other hand enemy team didnt kick the game ruiner which is a violation to ent ruling too. deserves ban for rule breaking i hope they acomplish this.
The Enterprise Gaming Administration keeps the right to enforce punishments on a case-by-case basis in order to preserve a healthy gaming environment.
[DOTA] kiiwa - europe.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 6:22 pm
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 154 times
Re: [DOTA] kiiwa - europe.battle.net
Prolonged afk confirmed.
kiiwa banned 3 days.
Each time a votekick was initiated slark immediately returned to game play, so from a sentinel standpoint it was not as clearly an afk/game ruining scenario and therefore their reluctance to votekick was understandable. No bans for failure to votekick.
kiiwa banned 3 days.
Each time a votekick was initiated slark immediately returned to game play, so from a sentinel standpoint it was not as clearly an afk/game ruining scenario and therefore their reluctance to votekick was understandable. No bans for failure to votekick.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 97 guests