Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 133707.w3g
Your Warcraft III Username: verroken
Violator's Warcraft III Username: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): Maphacking
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 15:00
Any further thoughts: This is my first time filing a ban request, please feel free to contract me on any further requirements you might need.
JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Hello,
I watched the replay and indeed he killed you while you were invi around 15 min replay time (not game time), but he had ultied u and you were low hp, and you were likely to go this way to the fountain (you went straight to it actually...). So I think that it is only a weak evidence.
Furthermore, he bought at least 6 wards in the 15 first min of the game, which is useless if he really mh.
So I will deny this request for me, and wait for another review.
I watched the replay and indeed he killed you while you were invi around 15 min replay time (not game time), but he had ultied u and you were low hp, and you were likely to go this way to the fountain (you went straight to it actually...). So I think that it is only a weak evidence.
Furthermore, he bought at least 6 wards in the 15 first min of the game, which is useless if he really mh.
So I will deny this request for me, and wait for another review.
- Triptronic
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 5:17 am
Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
he had vision, and like DiED said he wouldnt waste his gold on the wards if he was maphacking. This isnt proof but he definitely had vision imo.
-
- Treant
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:16 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
The fact he bought wards doesn't mean anything, because MHers usually buy wards to cover their mh (some of them aren't dumb to just use mh that obviously). JacksenTan does have a lot of suspicious moves, I've played with him before. But yea, this brq should be rejected due to lack of evidence. Just wanted mods to keep informed of this user for the future. I think this is the 3rd mh request out for him I saw.
"you the biggest wack job on dead ent" -burberry; Flamer/Fan; DotA
- Quetra
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 4775
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:11 pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 49 times
Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Just because it is possible for mhers to attempt to hide their tracks by doing things that are 'non suspicious' like buying wards doesn't mean that any such evidence should be automatically discounted as hiding their tracks. It can still be an indication that they are not mhing, just not conclusive if there are enough other suspicious moves.
- FalenGa
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 7857
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:38 pm
- Location: Mars
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 138 times
Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Map hack requests based on suspicious movements take plenty more than 1 particular incident. In this case, the aforementioned incident was not even suspicious.
You may repost this request once you've collected further evidence of map hack, and presented them to us.
Processing.
You may repost this request once you've collected further evidence of map hack, and presented them to us.
Processing.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests