JacksenTan uswest.battle.net

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

veroken247
Basic Tree
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:21 pm

JacksenTan uswest.battle.net

Postby veroken247 » Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:51 pm

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 133707.w3g
Your Warcraft III Username: verroken
Violator's Warcraft III Username: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): Maphacking
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 15:00
Any further thoughts: This is my first time filing a ban request, please feel free to contract me on any further requirements you might need.

User avatar
Quentin
Treant
Posts: 464
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:42 pm
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net

Postby Quentin » Tue Mar 07, 2017 1:18 pm

Hello,

I watched the replay and indeed he killed you while you were invi around 15 min replay time (not game time), but he had ultied u and you were low hp, and you were likely to go this way to the fountain (you went straight to it actually...). So I think that it is only a weak evidence.

Furthermore, he bought at least 6 wards in the 15 first min of the game, which is useless if he really mh.

So I will deny this request for me, and wait for another review.

User avatar
Triptronic
Armored Tree
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 5:17 am

Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net

Postby Triptronic » Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:13 pm

he had vision, and like DiED said he wouldnt waste his gold on the wards if he was maphacking. This isnt proof but he definitely had vision imo.
Image

CountChocula96
Treant
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:16 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net

Postby CountChocula96 » Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:54 pm

The fact he bought wards doesn't mean anything, because MHers usually buy wards to cover their mh (some of them aren't dumb to just use mh that obviously). JacksenTan does have a lot of suspicious moves, I've played with him before. But yea, this brq should be rejected due to lack of evidence. Just wanted mods to keep informed of this user for the future. I think this is the 3rd mh request out for him I saw.
"you the biggest wack job on dead ent" -burberry; Flamer/Fan; DotA

User avatar
Quetra
Protector of Nature
Posts: 4775
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:11 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net

Postby Quetra » Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:29 pm

Just because it is possible for mhers to attempt to hide their tracks by doing things that are 'non suspicious' like buying wards doesn't mean that any such evidence should be automatically discounted as hiding their tracks. It can still be an indication that they are not mhing, just not conclusive if there are enough other suspicious moves.

User avatar
FalenGa
Oversight Staff
Posts: 7857
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:38 pm
Location: Mars
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: JacksenTan uswest.battle.net

Postby FalenGa » Wed Mar 08, 2017 11:35 pm

Map hack requests based on suspicious movements take plenty more than 1 particular incident. In this case, the aforementioned incident was not even suspicious.

You may repost this request once you've collected further evidence of map hack, and presented them to us.

Processing.


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests