Vouch Rules

[Beastman]

Getting vouched, do we not follow this? I just noticed that several vouch requests have 5 or more unsupports and we still vouch. Any reason why or should we change rules?

"To play in LIHL, you must be vouched. To begin the process of being vouched, please post a topic in the Vouch Requests forum with the title account@east and the following format below. Within a five days window, at least five vouched players or a moderator must vouch for you in order to get your application approved for a trial period (only vouches vouching for one's LTD skill/knowledge will be counted; other comments will be considered as feedback). However, if five vouched players or a moderator deny your application with legitimate reasons, your application will be denied. Make sure to read the LIHL Guide on the wiki before applying as it describes important procedures. It is recommended that you observe several LIHL games during your application"

[HazarDous]

The key works in the rule you quoted are

if five vouched players [...] deny your application with legitimate reasons, your application will be denied

Ultimately, it falls under the moderators' discretion which vouches are valid or not. Most of the "!nosupport" comments I've seen barely took a few seconds to be written and some of these comments suggested that some level of bias was applied in their redaction.

TL;DR; if you want your opinion to be considered by mods, take more than 5 minutes to write it and either explain why X player lacks skills, or why X's attitude is not good enough for LIHL. Obviously, replay links are welcome.

If five (or perhaps less) comments alike are unsupportive of an applicant, I'm sure moderators will deny the application.

[hateloser]

As there are so many !unsupport for this Hodor person there must be a reason to it, this person is toxic and he won't listen to teammates result in team Tked , please check these 2 games and tell me how he's not tk https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9208812 and https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9209143
first game everyone told him to rr or yolo but he insist to hold with alpha and lod and stayed 2/0 , second game he got op rolls wov eggs tot and appa ended up tked , that's was first 2 games with him and 2 game was tked .

[Diablo_]

@beastman
The 5 support/no support rule was removed some weeks ago. Either the wiki was also affected by the 3 month rollback or we simply forgot to update it accordingly, but we surely made an announcement explaining why we no longer necessarily follow this procedure.

@hateloser
I mostly only see bad manners from you in the game.

e.g. first game where "everyone told him to yolo but he insisted on going holder"
*some discussion*
(02:04 / Allied) hate2lose: this guy [hodor] is new ?
*some discussion*

(03:21 / Allied) LooseYourself: but
(03:24 / Allied) LooseYourself: np guys
(03:33 / Allied) LooseYourself: if team disagree with me going holder 7
(03:35 / Allied) LooseYourself: i yolo
(03:51 / Allied) Jamo: I wouldnt hold with that units
(04:01 / Allied) hate2lose: and hes here
(04:07 / Allied) hate2lose: perfect
(04:17 / Allied) LooseYourself: so
(04:21 / Allied) LooseYourself: just call it
(04:24 / Allied) LooseYourself: i hold or not
(04:31 / Allied) Jamo: ask fuker
(04:33 / Allied) dafuker: follow ur heart
(04:33 / Allied) LooseYourself: i planned on 1 hades 7
(04:36 / Allied) dafuker: this is lihl
(04:44 / Allied) LooseYourself: y but we are team
(04:48 / Allied) hate2lose: second game here ?
(04:51 / Allied) Jamo: imo, u cant hold shit in mid
(04:56 / Allied) dafuker: we have immola for sure
(04:56 / Allied) LooseYourself: y
(04:57 / Allied) Jamo: so its not worth it
(05:01 / Allied) LooseYourself: you right jamo
(05:04 / Allied) LooseYourself: i cant hold mid
(05:06 / Allied) hate2lose: lihl is full of shit now lol
(05:09 / Allied) LooseYourself: but i can ez hold my lane
(05:24 / Allied) Jamo: so, just do what u like
(05:37 / Allied) hate2lose: do it
(05:39 / Allied) hate2lose: go hold
(05:39 / Allied) LooseYourself: ok
(05:45 / Allied) LooseYourself: i hold 7
(05:52 / Allied) LooseYourself: and rape 12 bosses lvl 10
(05:56 / Allied) LooseYourself: its the plan
(06:06 / Allied) LooseYourself: they suck hard 6 lvl
(06:35 / Allied) LooseYourself: btw pink
(06:36 / Allied) hate2lose: wtf is this guy numbling about ?
(06:39 / Allied) LooseYourself: dont be an ass
(06:43 / Allied) LooseYourself: im quite good
(06:51 / Allied) hate2lose: go ahead
(06:53 / Allied) hate2lose: and hold
(07:01 / Allied) LooseYourself: you keep shit talking
(07:09 / Allied) LooseYourself: without knowning me
(07:15 / Allied) hate2lose: how is he even allow in here ?

He was up for not going holder. If you instead of trashtalking and using sarcasm you would talk normally I'm sure he would have changed his plan.

Second game, not sure how wolv egg tot appa is an op roll but besides his underbuild level 3 he didn't really do anything wrong. Wolves just are a random (and bad ) unit and one mistake (lvl 3) happens to everyone every now and then.

[Diablo_]

Wiki will be updated soon and an announcement will follow.

[Don_Killuminati]

Come on Hate, wtf is this behavior ? You giving litteraly ZERO advice and you dare to be arrogant and flame ?
Act with manners and good sense especially if its someone that you dont know .....

About vouch request, i would say that 'recent' vouch are a way more forum active and its a good thing, but dont waste it by useless posts and speculation.

[FadingSuns]

Donky u nn behind him on every post against him. He has mouth and can defend himself?

BTW, from what i have seen until now, he is behaving nice in lihl. So i dont see a reason to blame him anymore.

Welcome hodor nigger.

[Don_Killuminati]

I'm his personal lawyer, 20$ each post and 40$ for hard cases.
If anyone is intersted, feel free to pm me boyz.