[LTD] London@uswest

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

Kreutertee
Treant
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:23 pm
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 65 times

[LTD] London@uswest

Postby Kreutertee » Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:26 pm

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=9855808
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #19
Your Warcraft III Username: butt.hole
Violator's Warcraft III Username: London@uswest
Violated Rule(s): Excessive flame vs. whole team, most time of the game
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): Starting in level 7
Any further thoughts:
He completely lost it from 7 when we talk about what to send in 7. He trying hard to force it, yelling, insulting us all. Threatening he won't build if we don't follow his call.

Even if I'd ignored him (I'm well aware of the command), the whole team would've had to do that. We couldn't discuss anything, he was throwing the whole team and game off. Insulting me, insulting whole team.

His closing words were this
(34:05 / All) London: thank god
(34:06 / All) London: we lose
(34:07 / All) London: trash team


But just take a look at the chatlog, he's pure toxic ruining fun for everyone. Not leaving any room for strategy discussion. We even forgot we naked king and no holder and blow 3 heals in 10. At least I forgot to be honest. But him ranting all game, just very hard to grasp a clear thought.

Not been the first time.

London1
Basic Tree
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 6:30 pm

Re: [LTD] London@uswest

Postby London1 » Tue Oct 03, 2017 5:42 pm

1st of all, it is the first time i actually play with u, so it doesnt matter if im a rager or not, i never met you before to even flame u
2nd of all, calling u garbage and bad at the game isnt excessive flaming, and it wasnt throughout the whole game, it was only during the time when you made me ob to 1.4k value as a ygg player and pussy out from an obvious send. as a lihl member ur supposed to at least know basics of the game.
3rd of all, our 3rd and 4th players didnt speak and therefore your stupid calls could not be contested (no call was forced by me??)

(11:49 / Allied) Braveheart_wins: =) blue pick
(11:50 / Allied) Braveheart_wins: herm or not
(12:10 / Allied) wladcapl: think we can
(12:16 / Allied) wladcapl: cuz we got nice push

(15:11 / Allied) butt.hole: teal called 1 furb
(15:13 / Allied) butt.hole: :)
(15:16 / Allied) butt.hole: when u asked
(15:17 / Allied) butt.hole: for his vote

?? teal asked blue to decide coz he had no opinion, when i asked for his vote, so your claim is wrong.
And blue did support my herm call, yet u decide to ignore it coz you are almighty professional

Did i hurt your feelings by calling you bad or what exactly. no rules were broken here except basic online gaming flaming which happens in every game

u decide to tk us with a skip 7 call, i flamed u back a little so live with it.

Also, saying "thank god we lost" isnt really against the rules, we lost coz we decided to upgrade king despite having a big holder, and we had no income/value to hold 15 (which ur plan was to skip and tk us again btw).. anyway whatever

Kreutertee
Treant
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:23 pm
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 65 times

Re: [LTD] London@uswest

Postby Kreutertee » Tue Oct 03, 2017 5:49 pm

You shouldn't quote selectively as it fits you.
Here is the actual order of events.

(10:23 / Allied) London: i vote go.
(10:27 / Allied) butt.hole: i vote no
(10:31 / Allied) London: blue/teal
(10:46 / Allied) London: go send im fat
(10:48 / Allied) London: 4 yggs
(10:52 / Allied) butt.hole: you cant hold 4 lanes
(10:54 / Allied) butt.hole: with naked king
(10:55 / Allied) London: I can :)
(10:56 / Allied) London: wave
(10:58 / Allied) butt.hole: so my vote clear no
(10:58 / Allied) Braveheart_wins: i would furb and king :P
(10:58 / Allied) London: go furb herm
(11:01 / Allied) London: furb herm
(11:01 / Allied) Braveheart_wins: enough for blaster
(11:03 / Allied) London: 4 yggs
(11:05 / Allied) London: 4 yggs
(11:05 / Allied) butt.hole: so 1 furb
(11:06 / Allied) London: i repeat


See how Brave voted only furb? It was 2v1 calls atm, blue being quite at this point.

So yes, what I said was 100% correct, contrary to what you're trying to say.
(15:11 / Allied) butt.hole: teal called 1 furb
(15:13 / Allied) butt.hole: :)
(15:16 / Allied) butt.hole: when u asked
(15:17 / Allied) butt.hole: for his vote


Was it in the end open what to send? Sure. Might have been 2v2 call, either one being right. I bet you would've forced the hermit, if you had the lumber. But you didn't. But that's not even the point. And if they immo, we lose 2-3 heals. But then again, that's not the point.

The point is you ranting in the game for 20 minutes and insulting everyone, in particular me. Trying to force your will on everyone threatenig not to build, threatening to intentional TK.

(11:40 / Allied) London: go herm
(11:45 / Allied) London: stop being bad
(11:49 / Allied) London: or i wont build 4th ygg


And yes, we've met before. I play different accounts (and I'm sure you know this) as do you (mudman, runescape2007, London, etc.). And you've always been well known for raging/insulting/flaming.

Anyway, I'm sure the mods will sort this out.

Cheers.
These users thanked the author Kreutertee for the post:
KiwiLeKiller (Tue Oct 03, 2017 6:07 pm)

User avatar
Jabba41
Protector of Nature
Posts: 7435
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 7:56 pm
Location: Germany - Hannover
Has thanked: 194 times
Been thanked: 158 times

Re: [LTD] London@uswest

Postby Jabba41 » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:51 pm

Banned 1 day.
Send me your best Sloth pictures for instant unban*

*individual results may vary


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 115 guests