[LTD] beklinge entconnect

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

lyndwyrm
Resource Storage
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 4:45 pm

[LTD] beklinge entconnect

Postby lyndwyrm » Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:38 pm

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 050257.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #47
Your Warcraft III Username: Lyndwyrm
Violator's Warcraft III Username: beklinge
Violated Rule(s): sending solo on 7 and almost every level after, not sending on the agreed level, not using lumber to up king when agreed on
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 13:05, 31:03, 33:53
Any further thoughts:

Beklinge
Basic Tree
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 10:52 pm

Re: [LTD] beklinge entconnect

Postby Beklinge » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:03 am

I did not agree with lyndwyrm' strategy and he just threathened to ban me. In my opinion, increasing income was the best choice, since I was only building archers. He forced me to subordinate under his personal strategy.

User avatar
Panopticon
Treant Protector
Posts: 851
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 3:03 am
Has thanked: 347 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Re: [LTD] beklinge entconnect

Postby Panopticon » Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:30 am

You're obviously refusing to cooperate and play with your team, and then there's this gem:

Spoiler!
(26:34 / Allied) Lyndwyrm: so he can cool down
(26:39 / Allied) beklinge: There is no reason for ban
(26:40 / Allied) Cyou_in_nl: -rolls
(26:43 / Allied) BeMadness: xD
(26:46 / Allied) Lyndwyrm: yes there is
(26:49 / Allied) beklinge: nop
(26:53 / Allied) Lyndwyrm: yes
(26:55 / Allied) beklinge: im not doing anything wrong
(26:58 / Allied) beklinge: just increasing my income
(27:09 / Allied) Lyndwyrm: you are, sending alone is bannable and its tk
(27:11 / Allied) beklinge: I dont agree with the strategy of the team
(27:20 / Allied) Lyndwyrm: thats not the point
(27:25 / Allied) Autarcha: lol panda
(27:30 / Allied) beklinge: You assume wrong things
(27:33 / All) Lyndwyrm: ANNOUNCEMENT: Tip: Check out our forum at entgaming.net for our rules, list of current games, and player statistics!
(27:37 / Allied) Lyndwyrm: trust me i dont
(28:52 / Allied) beklinge: You cannot force a player to agree with the strategy of otheres
(28:59 / Allied) Lyndwyrm: actually
(29:03 / Allied) Lyndwyrm: in a team game
(29:04 / Allied) Lyndwyrm: u can
(29:15 / Allied) beklinge: no
(29:27 / Allied) beklinge: that may be the forum's ad-hoc rule
(29:29 / Allied) BeMadness: red stop its useless
(29:29 / Allied) beklinge: not the game rul
(29:53 / Allied) Lyndwyrm: people have been banned for less
(29:55 / Allied) LegXon: we send together to win the game, that's the minimum
(30:00 / Allied) beklinge: In the forum, maybe
PSA: Bigtits = Iambackk

tinker_666 = ta-ta

Max-Well
Treant
Posts: 369
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 11:47 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: [LTD] beklinge entconnect

Postby Max-Well » Sun Nov 26, 2017 2:35 am

@Beklinge

Our rules are clear. If your team decides a tactic you have to follow.

Banned 2 days for refuse to teamplay


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests