Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10142658
Game Name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #29
Your Warcraft III Username: eternal_fame
Violator's Warcraft III Username: s0ruffpuppy
Violated Rule(s): votekick abuse
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): he votekicked abused minimum 2 times. also at min 40 game time he left me to die, while he was full hp and enemy survived on 1 hit he could have easily at least taken the kill but he tk-ed me
Any further thoughts: he did votekick abuse the next game as well https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10142807 to wisp
[DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:47 pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
- DotAKiasS]MzZ
- Resource Storage
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:47 am
Re: [DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse
Hello, @eternal_fame
After a view into this case, I have concluded that He indeed did a bit flame being hursh, as well he was continously issued a illegal !votekick abuse.
Afterwards, there was no pressence of a kick but he was persistent with kicking that player out.
Regards,
After a view into this case, I have concluded that He indeed did a bit flame being hursh, as well he was continously issued a illegal !votekick abuse.
Afterwards, there was no pressence of a kick but he was persistent with kicking that player out.
Regards,
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 3:40 am
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 18 times
Re: [DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse
@ethernal_fame when you are feeder with 800 Eli and more lost games then won don’t throw the solo on the only guy on the team above 1000 and when you do . Don’t feed FB ... simply because at this point it looks like you are game ruining . That’s why it was the VK . You threw a solo despite beeing called and despite multiple requests to let me carry your feeding ass
Unread postby child » Mon Apr 04, 2016 1:37 pm
you aren't banned for throwing you're banned for attempted throwing
you aren't banned for throwing you're banned for attempted throwing
- WolfPackMama
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2015 9:20 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: [DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse
Everyone knows ruff has a bit of an attitude (bit of unjustified attitude, to be precise, nothing wrong with having one if you can prove to be good for one). You learn to use the !ignore function before it happens to you, or dodge him when you can.
On a side note, if more than half the players ignore you every game, think about who's to blame?
Unjustified votekicks by stating things that aren't enough to be recognized as game throwing, or game ruining.
- Not calling misses isn't bannable. Any good player has a habit to look at the minimap once every few seconds.
- Not warding isn't bannable either. I do know that it's common practice that the mid wards first batch, since it can farm without having it's core late, but as the team's only support, you should step up to ward if your mid hasn't.
- Last hitting a hero kill isn't bannable either. It's rude, but that's about it. If you want your E-penis to grow up, first two things on the list will help you have less deaths compared to you having less kills from team mates last hitting you. And it rounds up to better KDA.
- "Stealing" runes isn't a bannable offence. Once again, it's rude and mildly dumb, especially if you've a bottle. But it's not an offence on it's own feat.
Review:
Two votekicks were initiated, both without solid ground, out of pure annoyance. Neither processed. Player "Stalagmit" voted on both.
(09:34 / All) S0RuffPuppy: !votekick fame
(17:50 / All) S0RuffPuppy: !votekick fame
Verdict:
Bannable offence on two votekick abuses.
On a side note, if more than half the players ignore you every game, think about who's to blame?
Unjustified votekicks by stating things that aren't enough to be recognized as game throwing, or game ruining.
- Not calling misses isn't bannable. Any good player has a habit to look at the minimap once every few seconds.
- Not warding isn't bannable either. I do know that it's common practice that the mid wards first batch, since it can farm without having it's core late, but as the team's only support, you should step up to ward if your mid hasn't.
- Last hitting a hero kill isn't bannable either. It's rude, but that's about it. If you want your E-penis to grow up, first two things on the list will help you have less deaths compared to you having less kills from team mates last hitting you. And it rounds up to better KDA.
- "Stealing" runes isn't a bannable offence. Once again, it's rude and mildly dumb, especially if you've a bottle. But it's not an offence on it's own feat.
Review:
Two votekicks were initiated, both without solid ground, out of pure annoyance. Neither processed. Player "Stalagmit" voted on both.
(09:34 / All) S0RuffPuppy: !votekick fame
(17:50 / All) S0RuffPuppy: !votekick fame
Verdict:
Bannable offence on two votekick abuses.
Mother of three gals who call themselves "The Wolf Pack", hence the name
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 3:40 am
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 18 times
Re: [DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse
(07:31) eternal_fame killed S0RuffPuppy
tottaly unjustified LOL. he feeed FB after throwing solo adn then kills teammates. and you wonder why i vote kick him
tottaly unjustified LOL. he feeed FB after throwing solo adn then kills teammates. and you wonder why i vote kick him
Unread postby child » Mon Apr 04, 2016 1:37 pm
you aren't banned for throwing you're banned for attempted throwing
you aren't banned for throwing you're banned for attempted throwing
-
- Forest Walker
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:47 pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 154 times
Re: [DOTA] s0ruffpuppy uswest.battle.net votekick abuse
(09:34 / All) kazaka91: A votekick against player [eternal_fame] has been started by player [S0RuffPuppy].
(17:50 / All) kazaka91: A votekick against player [eternal_fame] has been started by player [S0RuffPuppy].
Both vote-kick attempts were abusive.
s0ruffpuppy banned 2 days for votekick abuse.
(17:50 / All) kazaka91: A votekick against player [eternal_fame] has been started by player [S0RuffPuppy].
Both vote-kick attempts were abusive.
s0ruffpuppy banned 2 days for votekick abuse.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 140 guests