[DOTA] Slomosapien@useast

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

Brandon
Aura Tree
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2018 3:21 am

[DOTA] Slomosapien@useast

Postby Brandon » Thu Feb 15, 2018 6:08 am

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/10379780/
Game Name: [ENT] DotA arem us/ca #83
Your Warcraft III Username: BBQ
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Slomosapien
Violated Rule(s): refuse to kick game ruiner
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Any further thoughts: 8:00, 12:00 start afk and ruins up until 18:49
everyone voted except slomosapien and game ruiner friend (master_)

(11:54 / Allied) BBQ: !timestamp 10
(12:03 / Allied) BBQ: game ruining
(15:01 / All) BBQ: level 4 13 mins

(12:38 / All) BBQ: afk twce'
(12:57 / All) BBQ: still afk
(13:03 / All) x.pong: boot?
(13:09 / All) x.pong: boot both of them
(13:13 / Allied) BBQ: !votekick ze

07:50 / Allied) Zer0_: just ff
(07:53 / Allied) Zer0_: guys'
(07:56 / Allied) Zer0_: -afk
(08:43 / Allied) Zer0_: fuck this game
(08:44 / Allied) Zer0_: noops
(09:12 / Allied) Zer0_: one more
(09:15 / Allied) Zer0_: chanse
(09:19 / Allied) Zer0_: i gonna leace
(09:19 / Allied) MustBeNew: !ff
(09:25 / Allied) Zer0_: !ff
(12:34 / Allied) Zer0_: i dont wanna die bitch

(18:49 / All) BBQ: Zer0_ has left the game voluntarily.
(18:59 / All) BBQ: Master_ has left the game voluntarily.
both of them decide to leave game, after Zer0 already ruined

User avatar
Slomosapien
Treant
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:12 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: [DOTA] Slomosapien@useast

Postby Slomosapien » Thu Feb 15, 2018 6:36 am

Zer0_ saying these things was in allied chat. The quotes shown from chat here are not indicative of the conversation.

When I asked the reason for kicking he said "afk". Zer0_ unpaused the game, so clearly not afk. Then he said "ruining", but didn't answer when I asked how he was ruining.

BBQ said the game ruining was "obvious". There was no intentional feed, no item dest., nothing visible from my side of the game. Being low level or getting killed is not reason enough to kick.

If there's no valid reason for kicking, I'm not going to vote. Nor should anyone. If there is a reason, then you should explain it in all chat if asked.

Connorchaos
Forest Walker
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2017 7:39 pm
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: [DOTA] Slomosapien@useast

Postby Connorchaos » Thu Feb 15, 2018 2:49 pm

@Slomosapien
actually everything you just said there is wrong.
You can check his k/d/a ratio and his level from the in game score board. if you do not see him in team fights and he has no assists then its a pretty good indication he isnt playing. He is just moving at the fountain to reset the kick timer.

Un pausing does not mean he is playing

Next if his whole team agrees he is ruining and voting and you hear nothing back from him as an explanation thats is also a pretty solid indicator

Another good indicator was when everyone votes but you and the violator isnt saying anything in his defense

User avatar
Slomosapien
Treant
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:12 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: [DOTA] Slomosapien@useast

Postby Slomosapien » Thu Feb 15, 2018 6:04 pm

Connorchaos wrote: actually everything you just said there is wrong.
You can check his k/d/a ratio and his level from the in game score board. if you do not see him in team fights and he has no assists then its a pretty good indication he isnt playing. He is just moving at the fountain to reset the kick timer.

No assists or teamfight in the early stages of the game with doom doesn't mean anything. He could be jungling. Plus that's not entirely the case. He was in team fights earlier on and could be low level from dying.


Connorchaos wrote:Un pausing does not mean he is playing


Unpausing means he's not afk. Afk means "away from keyboard"

Connorchaos wrote:Next if his whole team agrees he is ruining and voting and you hear nothing back from him as an explanation thats is also a pretty solid indicator

Whole team voting means they want him kicked, not necessarily because they have a valid reason. People try to votekick unskilled players often. Doesn't make it right.

Connorchaos wrote:Another good indicator was when everyone votes but you and the violator isnt saying anything in his defense


See above. Also maybe he doesn't speak english and is new enough to not know that hes being kicked. He didnt say anything in all chat. Still no way for me to know.
These users thanked the author Slomosapien for the post:
Panopticon (Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:12 am)

BeerLord
Protector of Nature
Posts: 6658
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 154 times

Re: [DOTA] Slomosapien@useast

Postby BeerLord » Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:40 am

I think this player clearly met criteria for game ruin, and should have been kicked, but it often takes a little time and reasoned discussion to convince opposing players of the need (there was reasonable doubt in their minds), and since only one votekick attempt made, this did not occur here.
zer0_ banned 3 days for afk/game ruin.
No bans for failure to votekick.


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 90 guests