Supreme - 50 Games trial
Moderator: LIHL Staff
-
- Treant
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 4:23 am
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 49 times
Supreme - 50 Games trial
Based on our procedure, everyone (including you supreme) got the chance now, to provide replays from those 50 trialgames if you should stay vouched or not. The fact, that the games are limited, will make it way easier to judge your relative performance.
I wont accept any personal harassment or trashtalking here. If you can provide a replay, post it, comment it and let the moderation decide in the end.
I wont accept any personal harassment or trashtalking here. If you can provide a replay, post it, comment it and let the moderation decide in the end.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
Duno what is trully expected here to be attached.. Especially from me! Do not expect I provide a peasent holder lvl 7... Therefore I provide a very normal and standard game. Nothing big happened, just good calls of whole team and win. If U wanna watch it, u loose ur time, I promise. 49 impressive games to go.
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10413615
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10413615
-
- Aura Tree
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:05 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
u keep saying that it has nothing to do with counting and that u did not make a mistake
well lets see
here is exhibit 1-
this is after 3 and b4 level 4 where u have 187 gold and 10 inc and is 3/0
4 gives 194 after round u should have 391 we tell you to make wisp(go 4/0) as aod costs 340
but you dont sure its fine
exhibit 2-
here u up a phantom into hr and have 127 g left over
big fucking mistake 6 gives 198 g
198+127= 325 how is your inc supposed to cover a 35 g difference when u have 10 inc from b4 and now u need to send for 25 more which is 500 lum
here it has everything to do with counting
if u had listened to us you could have went 4/1 easily and still held 7
well lets see
here is exhibit 1-
this is after 3 and b4 level 4 where u have 187 gold and 10 inc and is 3/0
4 gives 194 after round u should have 391 we tell you to make wisp(go 4/0) as aod costs 340
but you dont sure its fine
exhibit 2-
here u up a phantom into hr and have 127 g left over
big fucking mistake 6 gives 198 g
198+127= 325 how is your inc supposed to cover a 35 g difference when u have 10 inc from b4 and now u need to send for 25 more which is 500 lum
here it has everything to do with counting
if u had listened to us you could have went 4/1 easily and still held 7
Last edited by Toolie on Sun Feb 25, 2018 10:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dweiler
- Plague Treant
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:28 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 232 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
Firstly, I agree a lot with what Meshtar says.
Then, obviously, the build here was pretty bad. Pure Darkness was needed. There is no need to keep arguing about it, if Supreme does not want to see it, then he won't.
We are not deleting any posts that are meant to help you with your build @Crazy_skeleton , it is pretty disturbing that all you want to do is to report and delete, when there are many sensible things said here.
To @Toolie and @boretk.panda , tune it down a bit. Especially in game it is obvious you respond stronger to him than others because he is in trial, which obviously confused him in that game and made him less able to concentrate. Also @toolie flaming someone after it happened is no use at all. You knew we had a thread for it, so just report it and try to help him improve if he wants to. No need to kick someone more who is already having a hard time.
Then, obviously, the build here was pretty bad. Pure Darkness was needed. There is no need to keep arguing about it, if Supreme does not want to see it, then he won't.
We are not deleting any posts that are meant to help you with your build @Crazy_skeleton , it is pretty disturbing that all you want to do is to report and delete, when there are many sensible things said here.
To @Toolie and @boretk.panda , tune it down a bit. Especially in game it is obvious you respond stronger to him than others because he is in trial, which obviously confused him in that game and made him less able to concentrate. Also @toolie flaming someone after it happened is no use at all. You knew we had a thread for it, so just report it and try to help him improve if he wants to. No need to kick someone more who is already having a hard time.
You don't stop playing because you grow old; you grow old because you stop playing.
-
- Treant
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 4:23 am
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 49 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
Just post replays and comment them, if you can't provide replays with comments, dont talk.
This post is made to have a objective judgement for Supremes case. Let the Moderation check the replays you provided with or without your comments.
I wont accept ANY kind of harrasment or witchhunt.
This post is made to have a objective judgement for Supremes case. Let the Moderation check the replays you provided with or without your comments.
I wont accept ANY kind of harrasment or witchhunt.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2017 12:44 am
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 120 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
I do not understand why you want only replays. It is kinda shocking me since both his attitude and his lack of skills are concerning here. His general attitude in the forum, in discord and in game should also be analysed here.
I know for sure trial vouches are judged both on their attitude and their skill level, why is it not the case here?
Just because you want to protect him from flame, insult, or harrassment doesn't mean you should delete ever single post made here. @Diablo_'s post and mine were, I think, respectful and we highlighted an important aspect of his attitude: the fact that he doesn't listen to any feedback and that he just wants to somehow delete all negative comments, with his little attitude of "I challenge you!"...
I know for sure trial vouches are judged both on their attitude and their skill level, why is it not the case here?
Just because you want to protect him from flame, insult, or harrassment doesn't mean you should delete ever single post made here. @Diablo_'s post and mine were, I think, respectful and we highlighted an important aspect of his attitude: the fact that he doesn't listen to any feedback and that he just wants to somehow delete all negative comments, with his little attitude of "I challenge you!"...
- These users thanked the author KiwiLeKiller for the post:
- Diablo_ (Mon Feb 26, 2018 6:55 pm)
"in a moment of extreme passion"
- Beastman (2017)
- Beastman (2017)
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
Kiwi wrote:I do not understand why you want only replays. It is kinda shocking me since both his attitude and his lack of skills are concerning here. His general attitude in the forum, in discord and in game should also be analysed here.
I know for sure trial vouches are judged both on their attitude and their skill level, why is it not the case here?
Just because you want to protect him from flame, insult, or harrassment doesn't mean you should delete ever single post made here. @Diablo_'s post and mine were, I think, respectful and we highlighted an important aspect of his attitude: the fact that he doesn't listen to any feedback and that he just wants to somehow delete all negative comments, with his little attitude of "I challenge you!"...
And I do not understand why u spam in this post techincal staff.
- dweiler
- Plague Treant
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:28 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 232 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
What is hard about it? We ask people to provide replays that they think are telling, so they know we look at those. We cannot watch all the 50 games on our own.
You don't stop playing because you grow old; you grow old because you stop playing.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10427669
I did nothing good or bad here. Game lost. Game lost. 47 games to go.
I did nothing good or bad here. Game lost. Game lost. 47 games to go.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10427933
Another game, 46 to go.
Another game, 46 to go.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10429275
Nothing to comment.. 45 to go
Nothing to comment.. 45 to go
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
Last edited by Crazy_Skeleton on Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:55 am
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 429721.w3g
I did nothing wrong here also + 7/2 almost free hold 7 with zeus..
43 games to go
I did nothing wrong here also + 7/2 almost free hold 7 with zeus..
43 games to go
-
- LIHL Staff
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 3:25 pm
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 127 times
Re: Supreme - 50 Games trial
Yes we expect people to give feedback aswell on your good games as comment on your gameplay as in every other trial aswell. Im just not doing it cause mod position btw.We had plenty of good games the last days
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests