[LTD] blizardau.eu, dankitydank.us, smururufs.eu, thane.eu, dblshotofurlove.us, sosneaks.us, cryxis.us

[TwieTonno]

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=10804798
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega #43
Your Warcraft III Username: Olderakuntmench
Violator's Warcraft III Username: blizardau.eu, dankitydank.us, + rest (smururufs.eu, thane.eu, dblshotofurlove.us, sosneaks.us, cryxis.us)
Violated Rule(s): Solosending, VK-Abuse
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
Any further thoughts:

03:36 - blue didnt send
05:07 - blue solosent
23:00 - blue soloupgrading king
23:55 - i tell blue to stop and save
24:00 - blue solosends
30:35 - blue solosends
35:18 - blue solosends
36:06 - i start vk, team east refuses
37:17 - green starts VK-Abuse against me + all players vk-abuse

blue kept solosending and upgrading the king for no reason, all the time. i told him to stop wasting his wood, yet at the last second before lvl 17 he ''secretly'' sent inferno. when i started vk against him team east refused. instead green started vk against me and all players typed !yes. thats VK-Abuse by all players -> Ban pls.

[Quetra]

(37:44 / All) SoSneaks: lol
(37:44 / Allied) smururufs: wtf lol
(37:44 / All) DankityDank: lol
(37:55 / Allied) smururufs: thought it was blue we were kicking

The abusive votekick was deceptive since it was initiated after your first votekick. It is reasonable to assume some of them believed they were kicking the violator, especially the members of your team who voted even though they had voted with you on the votekick and had no reason to want to kick you. It is of course possible that some of the enemy team other than the initiator had negative intents, but it's not possible to tell and I don't think it's fair to issue a ban there.

blizardau banned 2 days for solo send (didn't vote on vk)

DankityDank banned 5 days for votekick abuse.