Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/openstats/game/10842003/
Game Name: [ENT] LoD -sds6bod2fn #82
Violator's Warcraft III Username: dumdedum- useast.battle.net
Violated Rule(s): furion tp + rearm
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): building it in the first place, I am surprise that a person who plays dota in house doesn't bother to read or knows rules
Any further thoughts:
[DOTA] [LOD] dumdedum-@useast.battle.net
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:59 pm
- Location: Moved to Mars, http://www.torn.com/1967489
- Been thanked: 20 times
[DOTA] [LOD] dumdedum-@useast.battle.net
- Attachments
-
- game ruining .w3g
- (203.75 KiB) Downloaded 46 times
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 5:44 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: [DOTA] [LOD] dumdedum-@useast.battle.net
I didn't know this was banned, unfortunately.
I completely stopped using the spell as soon as it was brought to my attention. The replay will attest to that.
This is sorta going down a rabbit hole, but why is it banned anyways? It basically just gives you a 2k gold item (travels). There are many spells that are worth more than 2k gold...
I completely stopped using the spell as soon as it was brought to my attention. The replay will attest to that.
This is sorta going down a rabbit hole, but why is it banned anyways? It basically just gives you a 2k gold item (travels). There are many spells that are worth more than 2k gold...
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 3196
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:40 pm
- Has thanked: 123 times
- Been thanked: 196 times
Re: [DOTA] [LOD] dumdedum-@useast.battle.net
Cash is one of the nicest individuals and would never break a rule he knew was bannable. I think a warning is sufficient.
ENT Custom Games Discord ------------------ https://discord.gg/kGAUdTYZ5B
Re: [DOTA] [LOD] dumdedum-@useast.battle.net
cashmeoutside- wrote:I didn't know this was banned, unfortunately.
I completely stopped using the spell as soon as it was brought to my attention. The replay will attest to that.
This is sorta going down a rabbit hole, but why is it banned anyways? It basically just gives you a 2k gold item (travels). There are many spells that are worth more than 2k gold...
A bunch of extra spells were disabled with rearm in the newer map versions that are incompatible with b.net and they banned using whatever the map prevents you to pick in them.
-
- Protector of Nature
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 154 times
Re: [DOTA] [LOD] dumdedum-@useast.battle.net
I am satisfied with the explanation, and see no point for a ban at this point. Please remember that the point of most bans is to educate not punish.
Denied.
Denied.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 66 guests