New ID Rules Edit
Moderator: Oversight Staff
-
- Treant
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 1:49 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 30 times
Re: New ID Rules Edit
While suicide is against the rules, Xil has a point, the leaving rule also encourages riskier gameplay (which may not be a bad thing long term for the game's balance) and that risk can lead to a suicide like death.
"Sura is a God dude, like for real."
-Burn/Timmy/Avion
-Burn/Timmy/Avion
Re: New ID Rules Edit
Yarragon wrote:While suicide is against the rules, Xil has a point, the leaving rule also encourages riskier gameplay (which may not be a bad thing long term for the game's balance) and that risk can lead to a suicide like death.
But how do you determine suicide? Should every builder who dies at mid while golding be banned for suiciding? It's not really an enforceable rule.
- Merex
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 6626
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:45 pm
- Location: United States
- Has thanked: 297 times
- Been thanked: 175 times
Re: New ID Rules Edit
Suicide is determined by a multitude of factors, mainly if it's seen as blatant. That however is irrelevant to this rule.
The main idea behind builder leaving is to discourage such. Before this rule implementation, it was abused and went unpunished for a very long time. However, as I've stated in this topic, the rule exceptions aren't necessary. The staff took a great deal of time and effort coming up with these rules and is now regularly enforced. The exception being mentioned will only further reasons as to why player x can leave when it's clear we made this rule to prevent such.
I believe it's better that the staff keep the rule the way it is and in-fact change the Titan addition of it rather than the initial proposal.
Not necessary anymore, given the newest update has introduced an "xp increase" for titans/minions upon builder leaves.
The main idea behind builder leaving is to discourage such. Before this rule implementation, it was abused and went unpunished for a very long time. However, as I've stated in this topic, the rule exceptions aren't necessary. The staff took a great deal of time and effort coming up with these rules and is now regularly enforced. The exception being mentioned will only further reasons as to why player x can leave when it's clear we made this rule to prevent such.
I believe it's better that the staff keep the rule the way it is and in-fact change the Titan addition of it rather than the initial proposal.
Titan may not leave within the first 15 minutes of spawning, unless it has been explicitly stated by another player that they are willing to take over Titan,or at least 3 alive builders have already left the game or become an observer from not picking.
Not necessary anymore, given the newest update has introduced an "xp increase" for titans/minions upon builder leaves.
Changelog ID 4.0.1 wrote:- Enabled Missing Player feed increase, from now on any missing defenders will give the Titan an additional 6% experience
The Slap God - An EoC Story
- ENT Rules, Guides and more can be found on our Wiki.
- Contact the staff & interact with others by joining our Discord.
- Now available: Host A Game UI.
-
- Treant
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 1:49 pm
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 30 times
Re: New ID Rules Edit
Merex wrote:Not necessary anymore, given the newest update has introduced an "xp increase" for titans/minions upon builder leaves.Changelog ID 4.0.1 wrote:- Enabled Missing Player feed increase, from now on any missing defenders will give the Titan an additional 6% experience
So, the currently implemented version of the missing player feed only works so long as the player chose to go observer or left the game before picking a builder. It does NOT actually increase if the player has left the game.
I still feel the clarification suggested should be made official.
"Sura is a God dude, like for real."
-Burn/Timmy/Avion
-Burn/Timmy/Avion
- Haunt
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 4421
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2013 9:19 pm
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: New ID Rules Edit
I honestly don't see a reason to add any clarifications.
ID community has known what a leaver means since ENT started to host Island Defense. Just because we made a new rule to stop builders from ruining games, does not mean that you can throw away all common sense.
Once again it seems that ID players just want to troll and cause unnecessary drama.
You all know what a leaver is and what constitutes as leaving too early. Stop making things overly complicated.
Processing.
ID community has known what a leaver means since ENT started to host Island Defense. Just because we made a new rule to stop builders from ruining games, does not mean that you can throw away all common sense.
Once again it seems that ID players just want to troll and cause unnecessary drama.
You all know what a leaver is and what constitutes as leaving too early. Stop making things overly complicated.
Processing.
Return to “Suggestion Archive”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests