[DOTA] ITrainUFC

[just_stfu]

Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 691233.w3g
Game Name: DOTA
Your Warcraft III Username: scores
Violator's Warcraft III Username: ITrainUFC
Violated Rule(s): bypass ignore
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 50:52
Any further thoughts:

Here's the original request:
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=140746

Everything Unitil said is incorrect.

User does bypass the ignore, however, no flame was had only asdfa

At the exact timestamp given the user says "tiny u desperate hacker".

He is also the one to have ignored you at the start of the game.

I most definitely ignored him, and did so before he ignored me.

01:19 - I ignore him.
01:46 - he ignores me.

Unitil could not have possibly been more incompetent in processing the previous request.
Completely ignores the timestamp I gave, and fails to understand who ignored who. There are a whole 8 instances of "!ignore" in the chat log. That takes 10 seconds to sift through using ctrl-f.

[nitromon]

(01:19 / Allied) scores: !ignore ufc
(01:46 / Allied) ITrainUFC: !ignore scor

(50:52 / All) ITrainUFC: [tiny u desperate hacker] hasn't played any Island Defense games here.

You are correct about the timestamps, however at game already ended, I guess that's why the mod didn't see it. Not even sure it is bannable b/c the game already ended.

(50:48 / All) ITrainUFC: Stampede has left the game voluntarily.
(50:48 / QUIT) Stampede: Left
(50:52 / Allied) ITrainUFC: !si tiny u desperate hacker
(50:52 / All) ITrainUFC: [tiny u desperate hacker] hasn't played any Island Defense games here.
(50:55 / All) ITrainUFC: This game was hosted by GHost++

There are a whole 8 instances of "!ignore" in the chat log. That takes 10 seconds to sift through using ctrl-f.

That's not their job to do "sift through" the replays. It is the poster's job to post timestamps.

Frankly I think either way this is just petty on your part. Game already over, move on. This kind of behavior is what creates toxic gameplays.

[just_stfu]

You are correct about the timestamps, however at game already ended

Why does it matter? I was still in the game, and he knows I'm still in the game, and I still saw the message.
And technically the game ended several seconds after.

That's not their job to do "sift through" the replays. It is the poster's job to post timestamps.

"Bypass ignore" implies that ignore was used BY ME. Ten seconds is what it takes to verify that.
In the future I'll include the timestamp for that too, ok.

Frankly I think either way this is just petty on your part

This kid is convinced I'm a hacker.
(01:01 / Allied) ITrainUFC: care guys dg hacks
(01:03 / Allied) ITrainUFC: 100%

Does he have any proof? Of course not. But that doesn't stop him from saying this in every game I play against him.

Spewing baseless accusations contributes a lot more to a toxic environment than me submitting a ban request.

If I play tiny and find someone in the jungle, that couldn't possibly be because I'm always hunting the jungle and am bound to run into someone eventually. It couldn't possibly be wards. It couldn't possibly be map awareness (ie, I see someone leave lane and go in the direction of the jungle). No, it's 100% hacks.

[Unitil]

Ah incompetence is kinda harsh, specially when there is hardly any flame involved. This seems like you are scrapping the bottom of the barrel looking for something to stick ban wise.

However, I’ll process it now with this info I missed.

Wasn’t used to excessively flame and it was the end of the game. He made a baseless accusation which would need to be proven via replays. We have rules protecting users in-game against such things, and it is invalid to vote kick someone for baseless accusations of mhing.

Regardless, user did bypass ignore, user is warned.

Processing.