Banned for unclear reasons

Looking for your appeal? Approved or denied appeals are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

JungleBoyz
Basic Tree
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 12:11 am

Banned for unclear reasons

Postby JungleBoyz » Sun Mar 31, 2019 11:52 pm

Your Warcraft III username: iNeedaFriend
Realm/Gateway:
Why are you banned: It says because i didnt vk?
Why you should be unbanned: the ban doesnt even say what game. And i AM 100% sure that if there was someone feeding purposely i would have Kicked them. Maybe there was someone who was noob and kept dieing but none of who someoneone was feeding intentionally. I havent been banned in a long time and im disapointed that this happened by astros.

Astros
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:40 pm
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: Banned for unclear reasons

Postby Astros » Sun Mar 31, 2019 11:56 pm

ENT Custom Games Discord ------------------ https://discord.gg/kGAUdTYZ5B

JungleBoyz
Basic Tree
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 12:11 am

Re: Banned for unclear reasons

Postby JungleBoyz » Mon Apr 01, 2019 12:03 am

So because of some1 BEING bad in Dota we have to kick? I believe not I am not lieing . you should them bein bad is a REASON to warrant a Kick in which it does not unless they are intentionally feeding to ruin the game. Just because some1 hasn't fully learned the game or maybe having a bad day does not mean they need to Be Kicked. Please Astros Just because there was a Noob bein a noob doesn't mean he should be kicked I Feed sometimes too when I play too long you cant KICK some1 because of a bad day

Astros
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:40 pm
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: Banned for unclear reasons

Postby Astros » Mon Apr 01, 2019 12:09 am

JungleBoyz wrote:So because of some1 BEING bad in Dota we have to kick? I believe not I am not lieing . you should them bein bad is a REASON to warrant a Kick in which it does not unless they are intentionally feeding to ruin the game. Just because some1 hasn't fully learned the game or maybe having a bad day does not mean they need to Be Kicked. Please Astros Just because there was a Noob bein a noob doesn't mean he should be kicked I Feed sometimes too when I play too long you cant KICK some1 because of a bad day

I would agree with you but I gave you two examples of why Necro wasn't just bad but refusing to cooperate. Pushing solo, farming past your t2 tower for over a minute, and numerous warnings from his team should have been fairly evident. Most of Necro's deaths were from mines but it becomes fairly obvious, with those two timestamps provided, that he was not cooperating with his team. Also, your reasoning to not kick pink was because the other team killed drow but watching the replay, drow was not playing reckless like Necro was.
ENT Custom Games Discord ------------------ https://discord.gg/kGAUdTYZ5B

JungleBoyz
Basic Tree
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 12:11 am

Re: Banned for unclear reasons

Postby JungleBoyz » Mon Apr 01, 2019 12:17 am

From what I remember both were wreckless and Both had bad times Would be very wrong for us to kick our food when they would not kick theirs? and its not rots fault if he may have died from mines a lot which is most of deaths as you said. so if you take away the death from mines Hes not feeding just being a selfish player who hasn't died much if it wasn't for techies. So technically he would have not been ruining game if he didn't have as much deaths.ALSO, I was not the only who didn't kick there was atleast 5 more people to vote to kick him who did not kick him. So by seeing that I had a good feeling that he was not meant to be kicked . if I was the only one who wasn't kicking I would understand but you got half my team and their team who probably didn't vote because they knew he just sucked and was not intentional feeding.

Astros
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3151
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 9:40 pm
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 171 times

Re: Banned for unclear reasons

Postby Astros » Mon Apr 01, 2019 12:27 am

JungleBoyz wrote:From what I remember both were wreckless and Both had bad times Would be very wrong for us to kick our food when they would not kick theirs? and its not rots fault if he may have died from mines a lot which is most of deaths as you said. so if you take away the death from mines Hes not feeding just being a selfish player who hasn't died much if it wasn't for techies. So technically he would have not been ruining game if he didn't have as much deaths.ALSO, I was not the only who didn't kick there was atleast 5 more people to vote to kick him who did not kick him. So by seeing that I had a good feeling that he was not meant to be kicked . if I was the only one who wasn't kicking I would understand but you got half my team and their team who probably didn't vote because they knew he just sucked and was not intentional feeding.



1) You are entitled to votekick someone if you have a valid reason to do so. IMO, Drow was not reckless. Just playing poorly. Necro was reckless and playing poorly. Again, take a look at the timestamp. His entire team is near the base and he is pushing bot solo with no vision of the enemy. In the other timestamp, he is at T2 of your tower trying to kill creeps. He starts heading top and your team ganks him because he's hanging around there for over a minute. It's not like you didn't see that happening considered you and your team killed him there.

2) Yeah, the mines caused plenty of his deaths but that doesn't change the fact that he was being reckless. Again, why wasn't his other teammates dying as much to the mines? Hint: Because they were paying attention and sticking together.

3) The entire scourge team voted to kick him. It was brown who started one of the votekicks as well:

(22:23 / Allied) Breus: !votekick rot
(22:23 / All) DontCrY!: A votekick against player [rots] has been started by player [Breus]. 7 votes are needed within 60 seconds to pass.
(22:25 / All) DontCrY!: Player [T00MZ] voted to kick player [rots]. 6 more votes are needed to pass.
(22:28 / All) DontCrY!: Player [soulmuppet] voted to kick player [rots]. 5 more votes are needed to pass.
(22:44 / All) DontCrY!: Player [SirLord] voted to kick player [rots]. 4 more votes are needed to pass.

Since he is the one reporting you and you only, there is nothing I can do in regards to the other players. It seems like you admitting to not wanting to kick because drow was also playing bad caused him to single you out. Anyways, yes, you should have votekicked pink.


expired
ENT Custom Games Discord ------------------ https://discord.gg/kGAUdTYZ5B


Return to “Processed Appeals”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 103 guests