[LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Approved or denied ban requests are archived here.

Moderator: ENT Staff

sykotek
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:03 am

[LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby sykotek » Thu Jul 04, 2019 9:42 pm

Replay Link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=11760063
Game Name: Legion TD mega
Your Warcraft III Username: Lustone
Violator's Warcraft III Username: Snowwywolff
Violated Rule(s): Solo anti stucking, team called no as but he did as twice solo killed our big mid into big send we would have easily survived
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 40m
Any further thoughts: He also tk on level 7. He took king and not controlling it. He said nothing that someone took king i accidently clicked we lose 3 heal because of that tk

dinosgorawr
Basic Tree
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 5:01 am

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby dinosgorawr » Thu Jul 04, 2019 9:45 pm

I was on the other team. Would add that lustone seemed relatively toxic about this. Just salty about his loss in my opinion.

sykotek
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:03 am

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby sykotek » Thu Jul 04, 2019 9:46 pm

Just watch replay you will clearly see how he is killing us

i was only mad at his tk on king control 7 he took king and not controlling, again as half of our units x2 times on 18
Last edited by Haunt on Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged posts

SnowwyWolf
Treant
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 12:23 am
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby SnowwyWolf » Thu Jul 04, 2019 9:52 pm

First of all :
(34:53 / Allied) LustOne: retarded fucking shit
(35:30 / Allied) LustOne: stop that bullshit
(36:07 / Allied) LustOne: fuck you ?
(36:12 / Allied) LustOne: retarded noobs like you cause this


Regarding the level 7, I did not have control of the king, I had current 'ownership' but not control, any one could click the king at this stage to take it. I did not have king control on level 7, I had it on level 3 and left it alone since, any one from this point can click the king and take it for themselves at any point and control goes straight to them. The only time I ever see people announce "Take king" is just before a wave of creeps is about to hit the king as LustOne did on level 10. Proof of this would be the king attacking targets at random and not using any skill, also you can use a replay analyzer to see my selections, at that point it was not the king.

The only person to say No AS was the person who decided to flame me and then ignore me :
(40:41 / Allied) LustOne: no as


Check the replay, if we both did AS we hold two lanes, lose less units and have a bigger mid, even without the AS we lose a lot of units, regardless of this even if all the units went mid the game was still over. I have used AS in the past to snipe demons / krakens which changes the outcome massively. As anyone here knows I only play mega, I'm not on 1.2k player, no one said to no AS except the only person who had me on ignore.

Thanks.

Edit :
As much as I dislike LustOne due to his toxic nature, I still followed all of his calls throughout the game even when he disagreed with mine I taken his advice. Thus if he did not flame and then ignore me for no reason at all, I would have seen his 'no AS' call and followed that as I did all of his other advice.

sykotek
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:03 am

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby sykotek » Thu Jul 04, 2019 9:59 pm

just watch replay why i so toxic i never talked anything before he starting tk 7 he is just copy what i said bad things

SnowwyWolf
Treant
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 12:23 am
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby SnowwyWolf » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:13 pm

You are toxic in every game you play in actually, right after your ban expires no less.
Date: 04/07/2019, 11:56
(25:48 / Allied) LustOne: are you mad shit or something
(27:06 / Allied) LustOne: thats why i dont believe big shit mouths
(27:47 / Allied) LustOne: mb you know it
(27:51 / Allied) LustOne: you are looks retard
(28:22 / Allied) LustOne: you are noob ass shit
(28:32 / Allied) LustOne: you are noob ass shit 1k elo shit
(28:41 / Allied) LustOne: i know ppl like you retard
(29:02 / Allied) LustOne: acting like shit and reality is litte kid behind PC
(29:32 / Allied) LustOne: oj yell total tk


Date: 30/06/2019, 16:12
(01:32 / Allied) LustOne: as always
(01:40 / Allied) LustOne: retarded shit in every single game
(04:35 / Allied) LustOne: look this red retard
(04:37 / Allied) LustOne: grey
(13:54 / Allied) LustOne: full of retards
(13:55 / Allied) LustOne: really
(14:40 / Allied) LustOne: look that fucking retard holder
(16:36 / Allied) LustOne: look that bitch
(20:00 / Allied) LustOne: tell this retard
(20:01 / Allied) LustOne: come on
(20:02 / Allied) LustOne: fuckers
and more and more


So many more examples of you doing this every single day.

sykotek
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:03 am

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby sykotek » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:21 pm

He had king on 7 clearly we all saw yellow king. Plus if he took king he should announce that he is not controlling. He didn't. And he said see king hitting random target means i am not controlling ? . How am i supposed to look that ?. I see clearly yellow took king. We all saw we all agreed on that. Because of that we lose 3 heals it should be 1 heal.

When i say that he complain about it. And i got mad and ignored him. After that he tk again. How people ever as vs send. Very rarely they as. only If the merged person have enough value + anti units. But none of us had 0. We could've had BIG MID there. He totally killed us completely. You cant let this happen even if he is Staff

And he even toxic about me not ingame but on lobby. "You are banned so long how is that" something like this he treating on me like he is staff and i am his worker or something. He can say anything ? and not get banned. He can break every rule and not get banned ? because he is staff ? This goes like this or what ? I don't understand

See the replay and see this x2 times even more killing. He wanted to send vs greymane 6. This is also tk call he saw grizzly on 3.

He wanted to TK from the start i guess
Last edited by Haunt on Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged posts

SnowwyWolf
Treant
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 12:23 am
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby SnowwyWolf » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:36 pm

When i say that he complain about it. And i got mad and ignored him. After that he tk again. How people ever as vs send. Very rarely they as. only If the merged person have enough value + anti units. But none of us had 0. We could've had BIG MID there. He totally killed us completely. You cant let this happen even if he is Staff

We did have enough value + anti-units we would have held both lanes, I disagree with your analysis that we would have had a big mid there.

And he even toxic about me not ingame but on lobby. "You are banned so long how is that" something like this he treating on me like he is staff and i am his worker or something. He can say anything ? and not get banned. He can break every rule and not get banned ? because he is staff ? This goes like this or what ? I don't understand

Link the replay with lobby chat I was toxic to you in-lobby, I do not feel you have a grasp enough to understand that word if you think I have been toxic towards you. What have I said to deserve a ban? Give an example. I have broken every rule? I have not broken any? Yes I can get banned even being staff if other staff member agrees this request is valid.

See the replay and see this x2 times even more killing. He wanted to send vs greymane 6. This is also tk call he saw grizzly on 3.
He wanted to TK from the start i guess

I gave suggestions and followed all of your advice every single time you disagreed with a suggestion that I made, how is that TK? If I was going to TK I would have still sent on 6 even though you said not to but I listened to your advice throughout the entire game. This is clearly not a ban request with valid reasons but a personal vendetta against myself.

Augustinus
Treant Protector
Posts: 526
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:07 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby Augustinus » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:06 pm

It's a common strategy to let one wave run through and let the units of both players of a merged lane go mid. This is sometimes necessary to be mid with more units to have a better stand at holding all leaks in the middle.

No bannable action though, just because he doesn't follow this. No one is forced to merge. Should rly consider taking no mid mode and spare yourself this antistucking meta.

sykotek
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:03 am

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby sykotek » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:08 pm

ROFL you barely held your lane and you call this have enough value ? You had 0 normal damage unit you are just tk thats it ban him

No bannable action because you are staff ? you even banned me even worse situation both people ignored me and i announced send before they ignore and then i sent that level you banned me ? COME ONE ENT STAFF if you cant ban yourself someone do it please lets see the justice now

Team agreed on no AS. Only he solo as all the units Not even full but as half of our units TWICE. His side and my units too it was easy survive.
Last edited by Haunt on Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged posts

Augustinus
Treant Protector
Posts: 526
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:07 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby Augustinus » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:15 pm

sykotek wrote:Team agreed on no AS. Only he solo as all the units Not even full but as half of our units TWICE. His side and my units too it was easy survive.


Where is this bannable though? It's no AS abuse and he did it because he thought it was best. So it's not intentional TK worst case and even that isn't ban worthy.

Also given the drama in that game I doubt any rules can be enforced at this point. Game was already pretty much ruined by the toxic atmosphere and messy strategy.

sykotek
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:03 am

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby sykotek » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:17 pm

Clearly before game starts you treated on my like "How is that i banned your ass" something like this. And ingame you killed us twice. There is too much evidence on it. Now you call this no ban reason ? What a nice ENTSTAFF. On your situation you call it like this. And for others you ban for a long long time without reason. Nice staff

Augustinus wrote:
sykotek wrote:Team agreed on no AS. Only he solo as all the units Not even full but as half of our units TWICE. His side and my units too it was easy survive.


Where is this bannable though? It's no AS abuse and he did it because he thought it was best. So it's not intentional TK worst case and even that isn't ban worthy.

Also given the drama in that game I doubt any rules can be enforced at this point. Game was already pretty much ruined by the toxic atmosphere and messy strategy.


Haha you are funny guy. You must be snowwywolff another account or his licker. If you are blind or mentally damaged i will tell you again
1. Team agreed on no as.
2. He as half of the units alone into their send.
3. He also as my half units.
4. If the thinks its best ? so what about solo sending shits ? I think its best idea like that ? So solo send ban is not a situation for ban ?
Got to explain someone who mentally damaged.

Ok lets keep in mind that if you think its the best then you can do whatever you want to. Eventho its not team call. Augustinus said its not bannable. I will do what i want in the game lets do it like this ? He is ENTSTAFF ish and you are licking him like that ? if other person here you wouldnt even reply
Last edited by Haunt on Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged posts

SnowwyWolf
Treant
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 12:23 am
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby SnowwyWolf » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:23 pm

@Augustinus

I'll refer you to this post as well :
viewtopic.php?p=551177#p551177

The only person who said to not AS was LustOne who flamed and ignored me without any reason, I did not even see his message saying to not AS and I followed every single call he made throughout the entire game but if he ignores me I cannot see his calls.

LustOne just has a personal issue with me as evident by his barrage of posts on this BRQ.

sykotek
Resource Storage
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:03 am

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby sykotek » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:28 pm

Everyone said no as. And me too. He is just trolling around. Other team members blaming you because of your as

(40:41 / Allied) LustOne: no as
(40:46 / Allied) fancythis: no dd
(40:49 / Allied) SnowwyWolff: nice
(40:56 / Allied) SnowwyWolff: shud be easy hold
(41:08 / Allied) fancythis: 24?
(41:27 / Allied) fancythis: whyu as
(41:31 / Allied) LustOne: WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
(41:35 / Allied) SnowwyWolff: we cud of held with as if u as my other units
(41:35 / Allied) fancythis: fuck are u doing yellow
(41:37 / All) LustOne: GG
(41:40 / All) LustOne: yellow killed us
(41:40 / Allied) SnowwyWolff: if u as
(41:42 / All) LustOne: reporting
(41:43 / Allied) SnowwyWolff: we hold easy both lanes
(41:43 / All) zero_sum_game: gg
(41:43 / Allied) fancythis: well too late for that
(41:45 / Allied) Oldboy: omg
(41:46 / Allied) fancythis: fucking kt
(41:46 / Allied) fancythis: tk
(41:48 / All) zero_sum_game: lol good luck with that
(41:48 / Allied) Oldboy: we said no as
(41:49 / Allied) n1qq: !scores
(41:50 / Allied) SnowwyWolff: how is it tk?
(41:55 / Allied) fancythis: team called no as
(41:57 / All) pastuszek: 20 elo
(41:58 / Allied) fancythis: and u still as

this is the proof

(14:53 / Allied) LustOne: you took king
(14:54 / Allied) LustOne: and afk ?
(14:55 / Allied) fancythis: what was this king
(15:01 / Allied) LustOne: yellow
(15:04 / Allied) fancythis: yellow had king
(15:07 / Allied) SnowwyWolff: I didn't have it
(15:09 / Allied) SnowwyWolff: that was from before.
(15:10 / Allied) LustOne: you got king yellow
(15:30 / Allied) LustOne: dont ever click on king
(15:32 / Allied) LustOne: if you dont control
(15:35 / Allied) SnowwyWolff: I didn't
(15:39 / Allied) SnowwyWolff: I clicked it in a previous round

simply our team agrees on his tk. Just read what i said first of all. I did not rage or anything. But this guy refuses his mistake and act like cool

(16:39 / Allied) SnowwyWolff: You can see the king attacking random units? It means no one has it, common sense says to click it by default :)
Look what does it mean ? He got king and didnt say anything. How we know that he is afk ?

read the chat i was making right calls all the time. And he wanted to send 6 vs greymane

(42:27 / All) SnowwyWolff: tk? we hold 2 lanes with AS lol
(42:28 / All) zero_sum_game: ggwp
(42:29 / Allied) Oldboy: lol we would not

all team agrees on his tk i showed you all the proofs enough talking here just wanna see the result.
Last edited by Haunt on Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged posts

SnowwyWolf
Treant
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 12:23 am
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: [LTD] [ENTgaming] [Snowwywolff]

Postby SnowwyWolf » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:50 pm

Everyone said no as. And me too. He is just trolling around.

You said no AS after you ignored me, no one else on the team said no as, why are you lying for?


Return to “Processed Requests”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 130 guests