Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 763873.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #79
Your Warcraft III Username: ^KKC_
Violator's Warcraft III Username: soulkiller , kakkmaddafakka
Violated Rule(s): Force king
Time of Violation (in-game or replay):
(29:47 / Allied) soulkiller: we could king>20
(29:49 / Allied) soulkiller: could also work
(29:54 / Allied) soulkiller: safe for 16 then
(29:56 / Allied) kakkmaddafakka: go?
(29:59 / Allied) soulkiller: ye go
(30:01 / Allied) asm3k: no
Any further thoughts: First up happens as soon as teal says "NO" They left open a 5 second gap to decide for the team and as soon as teal says no they start upping the king (red spends all his wood) every1 else saves atleast 1k , at this point i was left shocked i didnt even get to disagree with them as they were already maxing king.
Took them 5 sec to decide even tho is was 2/2 to up or not while i was considering the idea of king 20 ( i was active calling and talking in every call )
This in my opinion is a force king.
[LTD] soulkiller , kakkmaddafakka
Moderator: ENT Staff
-
- Armored Tree
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 12:05 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: [LTD] soulkiller , kakkmaddafakka
3 reports in 3 days, im a celebrity.
I suggested and didnt do first up, once ups starts i did it...
and yes red did to much so wasnt split.
I suggested and didnt do first up, once ups starts i did it...
and yes red did to much so wasnt split.
-
- Treant
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2019 12:23 am
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: [LTD] soulkiller , kakkmaddafakka
It's a team game and 50% of the team made a ca to up the king, this wasn't forcing mind in my view as more than one person agreed with it. Also there was a 15 second gap to disagree, not a huge gap but enough time to type no etc.
Denied.
Denied.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 85 guests