Replay Link: http://storage.entgaming.net/replay/vie ... 765494.w3g
Game Name: [ENT] Legion TD Mega 1200+ #96
Your Warcraft III Username: Viserion
Violator's Warcraft III Username: ffabuse
Violated Rule(s): Refused to cooperate: Ignored all 3 players before lvl 1 for no reason and didnt unignore.
Time of Violation (in-game or replay): 47 sec
Any further thoughts: Easy work for you guys cant be more clear..
[LTD] ffabuse ignored all 3 players for no reason before lvl1
Moderator: ENT Staff
- FalenGa
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 7857
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:38 pm
- Location: Mars
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 138 times
Re: [LTD] ffabuse ignored all 3 players for no reason before lvl1
How did his actions affect the game? Did he not follow your sends? Did he send units you guys did not agree to? Did he not upgrade king with you?
If he did any of the above, please provide the time(s) of violation. @Viserion
If he did any of the above, please provide the time(s) of violation. @Viserion
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: [LTD] ffabuse ignored all 3 players for no reason before lvl1
I was in that game. It affect the game for once because you can't communicate calls and discuss them.
Then some minor fails happen because of this such as:
It is gameruining for obvious reasons and he could have left the lobby if he has no desire to teamplay. Was also considered gameruining in the past.
Then some minor fails happen because of this such as:
- 5 commanders lvl 8 send
- no communication possible about obvious leak lvl 3 so it happened
- other players have to adjust their lane to not knowing what yellow will do such as creating 3 10 holders instead of allowing one more player to push
It is gameruining for obvious reasons and he could have left the lobby if he has no desire to teamplay. Was also considered gameruining in the past.
Re: [LTD] ffabuse ignored all 3 players for no reason before lvl1
This is is absolutly hilarious. Viserion and Charlotte ignore half of the community even before the game starts. And MasterofthePit as always has to put her oar in, which is completly unqualified and just based on subjective feelings.
Re: [LTD] ffabuse ignored all 3 players for no reason before lvl1
I dont know... Isnt there a violation called "refused to cooperate"? How can he cooperate if he insta ignore whole team?? The fact that we handled this shit somehow makes it less violating? Well, if guys think so so be it... But ive heard that its a ban itself if u just ignore whole team from lvl 1 on so u decide...
-
- Treant Protector
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2017 1:38 pm
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 42 times
Re: [LTD] ffabuse ignored all 3 players for no reason before lvl1
Viserion wrote:I dont know... Isnt there a violation called "refused to cooperate"? How can he cooperate if he insta ignore whole team?? The fact that we handled this shit somehow makes it less violating? Well, if guys think so so be it... But ive heard that its a ban itself if u just ignore whole team from lvl 1 on so u decide...
Well aren't we all used to the fact that 90% off the community don't even join when you in same team?
- FalenGa
- Oversight Staff
- Posts: 7857
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 2:38 pm
- Location: Mars
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 138 times
Re: [LTD] ffabuse ignored all 3 players for no reason before lvl1
(01:55 / Allied) ffabuse: !unignore sham
(02:04 / Allied) ffabuse: we going 2 scambles?
You missed the part where he unignores one of you and communicates with him.
He sent everything correctly as per the team's decisions. He was obviously going holder, you didn't have to ask him to find that out, but pink could if you wanted. About the leak on 3 pink did warn him but it was too late as he had pushed right after they sent 2.
Nothing bannable here.
(02:04 / Allied) ffabuse: we going 2 scambles?
You missed the part where he unignores one of you and communicates with him.
He sent everything correctly as per the team's decisions. He was obviously going holder, you didn't have to ask him to find that out, but pink could if you wanted. About the leak on 3 pink did warn him but it was too late as he had pushed right after they sent 2.
Nothing bannable here.
Return to “Processed Requests”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 128 guests